-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When installed libqt3-devel, have more dependences : libmng-devel,
liblcms-devel, libadudio-devel and so, and so .. to
infinite. I have download and installed some packages and say me :
failed dependences : need libmng-devel, liblcms-devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Rudi :
Don't work. I have installed it, without error, but don't start.
I have make the command lyx -dbg 2 and that is the log :
lyxrc.dist Not found
Preferences Not found
Encodings Not found
Languages Not found
Reading layouts ...
here stop.
Som
> "Rudi" == Rudi Gaelzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rudi> Hi, Jean-Marc. I created a new rpm from Georg's intructions. Its
Rudi> name is: lyx-1.4.3-1_qt_mdv2006.i586.rpm
Very good.
Rudi> I uploaded it to ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/incoming. The ftp client
Rudi> reported a successful transfer, bu
Hi, Jean-Marc.
I created a new rpm from Georg's intructions. Its name is:
lyx-1.4.3-1_qt_mdv2006.i586.rpm
I uploaded it to ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/incoming. The ftp client reported a
successful transfer, but I could not get the directory listing to confirm.
Could you please verify for me?
Th
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
>> I just don't know if I got the requires list quite right. As per
>> instructions, I ran checkinstall with no extra options. On the man
>> page, I noticed that you can include extra requirements to the
>> final rp
On Thursday 12 October 2006 12:05, Georg Baum wrote:
> I did not know that you used checkinstall. I just corrected the wiki page,
> because checkinstall builds suboptimal packages. They should not be
> distributed IMHO. If you use the rpm spec file that is inside the source
> archive then you get b
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> Hi, Christian.
> On Wednesday 11 October 2006 17:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Ok, so we'll keep the page. I didn't quite understand if you wanted to
> > keep the name of the page, or thought it was ok to rename it to 'LyX on
> > RPM-based Linux'? (Or
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> I just don't know if I got the requires list quite right. As per
> instructions, I ran checkinstall with no extra options. On the man page,
> I noticed that you can include extra requirements to the final rpm
> package, but
> I did not do that. Here's the list from:
I did
On Thursday 12 October 2006 11:51, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Rudi" == Rudi Gaelzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What does the LE stand for? Only 2005 was a LE version (because they
> rushed it out, IIRC).
Really? I didn't pay attention to that... My bad, sorry... perhaps you should
r
> "Rudi" == Rudi Gaelzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rudi> I think it's safe to say that the answers to both your questions
Rudi> is yes.
Rudi> I just don't know if I got the requires list quite right. As per
Rudi> instructions, I ran checkinstall with no extra options. On the
Rudi> man page,
Thanks, Georg.
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 12:15, Georg Baum wrote:
> If your package was built from clean sources and it is useful for a wider
> audience, i.e. it does not require anything that is not part of your
> distro, then it would be a good idea to put it on the LyX ftp server. If
> you w
Hi, Christian.
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 17:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok, so we'll keep the page. I didn't quite understand if you wanted to
> keep the name of the page, or thought it was ok to rename it to 'LyX on
> RPM-based Linux'? (Or if you have another suggestion for the name of the
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 October 2006 17:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I might have created the page based on Paul's post. The page should
> > probably say that LyX is in Fedora Extras (whatever that is).
> >
> > Is there a point to having a page describing h
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> Anyway, I got at least one person interested in my package. Is there any
> possibility that I can upload it to an official mirror? I don't have any
> public repository quota available to me, right now...
If your package was built from clean sources and it is useful for a wid
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 17:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I might have created the page based on Paul's post. The page should
> probably say that LyX is in Fedora Extras (whatever that is).
>
> Is there a point to having a page describing how to create LyX RPM? If so,
> maybe the page could be
> Is there a point to having a page describing how to create LyX RPM? If so,
> maybe the page could be called 'LyX on RPM-based Linux'?
>
>
+1 as official Mandriva also has rpm packages for Lyx, Mandriva 2006 is
just offering a little bit older 1.3x version.
On 10/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I managed to create a RPM package of lyx 1.4.3 for Mandriva Linux LE 2006.
> > > I followed the guidelines originally posted by Paul Smith and Christian
> > > Ridderström in:
> > >
> > > http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnRedHat
> >
> > No
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Paul Smith wrote:
> On 10/10/06, Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > I managed to create a RPM package of lyx 1.4.3 for Mandriva Linux LE 2006.
> > > I followed the guidelines originally posted by Paul Smith and Christian
> > > Ridderström in:
> > >
> > > http://wiki
On 10/10/06, Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I managed to create a RPM package of lyx 1.4.3 for Mandriva Linux LE 2006.
> I followed the guidelines originally posted by Paul Smith and Christian
> Ridderström in:
>
> http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnRedHat
Now that lyx is in Fedora Extras (a
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> I managed to create a RPM package of lyx 1.4.3 for Mandriva Linux LE 2006.
> I followed the guidelines originally posted by Paul Smith and Christian
> Ridderström in:
>
> http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnRedHat
Now that lyx is in Fedora Extras (and has been for some time), is
20 matches
Mail list logo
