Re: ltxcmds.sty

2020-01-14 Thread John White
Hi Doc and Happy New Year! Though I am having no problems with lovely lyx, for the heck of it I ran "tlmgr update --all --self" and got this response: johwhi@johwhi:~$ tlmgr update --all --self John On Monday, January 13, 2020 2:24:18 PM PST Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote: > The Oberdiek package ha

Re: ltxcmds.sty

2020-01-14 Thread Axel Dessecker
Am Dienstag, 14. Januar 2020, 11:29:36 CET schrieb F M Salter: > Hi > > Thanks for all your suggestions. > > > On 1/13/20 11:58 AM, F M Salter wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Suddenly compiling lyx documents for one user produces the bizarre > >> > >> situation that not one will compile.

Re: ltxcmds.sty

2020-01-14 Thread Dr Eberhard Lisse
The Oberdiek package has been changed, moving a number if packages out, which now need to be manually installed. On the Mac and Unix this is easy, just run something like tlmgr update --all --self and tlmgr install ltxcmds the latter you need to do for each missing package, or

Re: ltxcmds.sty

2020-01-13 Thread Paul A. Rubin
On 1/13/20 11:58 AM, F M Salter wrote: Hi,     Suddenly compiling lyx documents for one user produces the bizarre situation that not one will  compile. They all report that ltxcmds.sty is required.  This is true even for a document with only the single word "test" as contents.  Other users ar

Re: ltxcmds.sty

2020-01-13 Thread Axel Dessecker
Am Montag, 13. Januar 2020, 17:58:29 CET schrieb F M Salter: > Hi, > > Suddenly compiling lyx documents for one user produces the bizarre > situation that not one will compile. They all report that ltxcmds.sty > is required. This is true even for a document with only the single word > "test