Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

2011-01-28 Thread Walter
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg83713.html > > Ok, AFAIU this refers to the XeLaTeX engine and not to LyX. > Of course, if someone wants to develop a solid algorithm for language > guessing and can convince the LyX developer community of it and has the > resources to imple

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

2011-01-27 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Stephan Witt wrote: > Of course, if someone wants to develop a solid algorithm for language > guessing and can convince the LyX developer community of it and has the > resources to implement and test it - it may happen. Another option > would be to have a spell checker backend including this featur

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

2011-01-27 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 27.01.2011 um 14:05 schrieb Walter: >>> Whilst using LyX 2.0beta1 [since verified on LyX 2.0beta3] I recently ran >>> a spell check for the first time. >>> >>> The interface is good and no doubt an improvement on previous eras, however >>> the following struck me as possible to improve. >>> >

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

2011-01-27 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 27.01.2011 um 15:16 schrieb Walter: >> This sounds ugly. Is there any similarity between spell checking APIs? Is >> there a cross platform, spell checking library unification / abstraction >> layer >> available? Would it be worth developing one? How difficult is it to detect >> known diction

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

2011-01-27 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Walter wrote: >> This sounds ugly.  Is there any similarity between spell checking APIs?  Is >> there a cross platform, spell checking library unification / abstraction >> layer >> available? Would it be worth developing one? How difficult is it to detect >> known

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

2011-01-27 Thread Walter
> This sounds ugly.  Is there any similarity between spell checking APIs?  Is > there a cross platform, spell checking library unification / abstraction layer > available? Would it be worth developing one? How difficult is it to detect > known dictionaries and spell checkers on a cross-platform bas

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

2011-01-27 Thread Liviu Andronic
Hello This is a long document indeed and, unfortunately, I couldn't find the will to go through it all. But I should have a couple of interesting references regarding multilingual documents. This has been discussed previously on the list, in the context of XeTeX support in LyX 2.0 SVN: ht

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

2011-01-27 Thread Walter
> I'll try to answer this - although I surely don't have so much time you had > to write this. Relativity... >> Whilst using LyX 2.0beta1 [since verified on LyX 2.0beta3] I recently ran >> a spell check for the first time. >> >> The interface is good and no doubt an improvement on previous eras,

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

2011-01-27 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 26.01.2011 um 15:00 schrieb Walter: I'll try to answer this - although I surely don't have so much time you had to write this. > Whilst using LyX 2.0beta1 [since verified on LyX 2.0beta3] I recently ran > a spell check for the first time. > > The interface is good and no doubt an improvement