Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 08:05 schrieb G. Milde:
> On 21.05.08, Manveru wrote:
> > What I see here from those few responses different TeX distros have
> > different implementation (if I can tell that) of Latin Modern typefaces
> > in details. Very strange.
>
> To me it looks rather like a font sub
-- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --
Subject: Re: +/- in a table too large
Date: Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 08:15
From: Wolfgang Engelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul A. Rubin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2008 20:52 schrieben Sie:
> Wolfgang En
On 21.05.08, Manveru wrote:
> What I see here from those few responses different TeX distros have
> different implementation (if I can tell that) of Latin Modern typefaces in
> details. Very strange.
To me it looks rather like a font substitution -- some font missing in some
disttributions or old
What I see here from those few responses different TeX distros have
different implementation (if I can tell that) of Latin Modern typefaces in
details. Very strange. The question we have here now is which distributions
are fine by default, and which may need some additional tweaks to get math
symbo
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 12:36:01 pm Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Have a look at the document settings. I can´t see any strange things there,
> and the error stays after taking out the preamble entrances
I can see exactly what you are talking about. The +/- symbol appears too
large. But only if yo
2008 4:12:16 PM
Subject: Re: +/- in a table too large
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
>
> thanks for the various responses. Here is a minimal example
>
> Have a look at the document settings. I can´t see any strange things there,
> and the error stays after taking out the preamble en
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
thanks for the various responses. Here is a minimal example
Have a look at the document settings. I can´t see any strange things there,
and the error stays after taking out the preamble entrances
Wolfgang
This might be a repost -- I tried to post a response but i
Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2008 14:40 schrieb Paul A. Rubin:
> Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2008 11:51 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> >> Again a question:
> >> in a table is in math mode e.g.
> >> 50.9\pm1.3
> >> the export (pdf) shows too large +/- (see appendix)
> >> is this a bug
I can't reproduce that (just tried 1.6.0alpha2 on Windows XP), as the table
spacing looks fine.
One way you might be able to work around it is using a \nicefrac{+}{-}
instead of \pm. I personally don't prefer \nicefrac in this case, but it might
work.
Cheers,
C.O
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2008 11:51 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
Again a question:
in a table is in math mode e.g.
50.9\pm1.3
the export (pdf) shows too large +/- (see appendix)
is this a bug or should I use something else or add \small in front of it?
Wolfgang
I just noti
The typeface is suspected. Some symbols are joined from two characters when
selected typeface has not correct glyph in the set. Are you using any
alternative font settings in your document? What text size is chosen?
2008/5/20 Wolfgang Engelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2008 11:
Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2008 11:51 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> Again a question:
> in a table is in math mode e.g.
> 50.9\pm1.3
> the export (pdf) shows too large +/- (see appendix)
> is this a bug or should I use something else or add \small in front of it?
>
> Wolfgang
I just noticed that the sam
12 matches
Mail list logo
