> Rob S wrote:
> > In Addition - Having the instant preview means the lack of math
> > symbols/fonts in the Win32 QT 2.3 package is now no longer a
problem.
My error, I had not installed the fonts correctly! Doh!
Thanks Paul R. for the info. I'll add notes to the windows setup wiki to
reflect th
Rob S wrote:
In Addition - Having the instant preview means the lack of math
symbols/fonts in the Win32 QT 2.3 package is now no longer a problem.
Rob,
Are you saying that there are symbols that simply do not display when
editing a math inset, or are you referring to the Qt 2.3 issue where
certai
>
>
> Rob> In Addition - Having the instant preview means the lack of math
> Rob> symbols/fonts in the Win32 QT 2.3 package is now no longer a
> Rob> problem.
>
> Except when you edit the formulas, maybe?
Agreed, but only a minor annoyance only now.
All symbols/fonts show without problem in t
Rob S wrote:
> In Addition - Having the instant preview means the lack of math
> symbols/fonts in the Win32 QT 2.3 package is now no longer a
> problem.
>
> :-)'s all round!
Can you remind me what the problem is again?
--
Angus
> "Rob" == Rob S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> In Addition - Having the instant preview means the lack of math
Rob> symbols/fonts in the Win32 QT 2.3 package is now no longer a
Rob> problem.
Except when you edit the formulas, maybe?
>
> the person to really thank is David
> Kastrup who wrote preview.sty.
Here here!
> Please feel free to add to the wiki page. You're the users, it's
> you're wiki and I have no knowledge of Windows ;-)
I'll have a look at it later, if not done so already.
In Addition - Having the instant pre
Rob S wrote:
> I got the instant preview up and running as mainly per the wiki
> page: http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/LyX/InstantPreview
> However I had to follow the steps Timm Danker posted
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg69661.html
> with regards to the placement of scripts a
