Re: Question on whitespace at the end of raw TeX - inserts

2009-01-15 Thread Dieter Jurzitza
Dear Helge, thank you for your reply. There were several of them - and I came to the end that I - to some extend - took it too simple. My personal wrap up is the fact that the current TeX-inserts in LyX are not encapsulated - i. e. they reach further than the closing insert "bracket". So, maybe

Re: Question on whitespace at the end of raw TeX - inserts

2009-01-15 Thread Helge Hafting
Dieter Jurzitza wrote: Hi folks, first of all: thank you for all your replies. And yes, after hearing what you came up with I think ERT should remain ERT and inserting an automatic blank _within_ the ERT is not a good idea. But wait: what is LyX saying about itself, WYSIWYM? Hey, if I put a w

Re: Question on whitespace at the end of raw TeX - inserts

2008-12-23 Thread Dieter Jurzitza
Dear David, if I get you right you suggest protecting the first whitespace following ERT - if there is one - the point is that the developers say they do not want to cope with side effects from ERT as ERT is a "do that if you _really_ know what you do! And expect side effects on the document!"

Re: Question on whitespace at the end of raw TeX - inserts

2008-12-23 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
dcmertens wrote: > abcdef ghi > -to tex- > abcdef\ ghi Because this is not expected in all cases, and because you cannot revert this to a normal blank (whereas you can always get the desired result if you insert an "inter-word space" [M-C-] instead of a normal blank). For instance, if I write M

Re: Question on whitespace at the end of raw TeX - inserts

2008-12-23 Thread dcmertens
Quick question: why doesn't LyX do this? abcdef ghi -to tex- abcdef\ ghi I totally agree that you shouldn't mess with ert; that's the point of ert. But this would protect the spaces _outside_ of ert as Dieter described. For that matter, this could be applied to any other insert if desired. If

Re: Question on whitespace at the end of raw TeX - inserts

2008-12-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Dieter Jurzitza writes: > But wait: what is LyX saying about itself, WYSIWYM? Hey, if I put a > whitespace after the end of an ERT you tell me we see it but we won't > protect it because you put it there but because you've been working > with an ERT before we are sure you did not mean to see a whi

Re: Question on whitespace at the end of raw TeX - inserts

2008-12-22 Thread Dieter Jurzitza
Hi folks, first of all: thank you for all your replies. And yes, after hearing what you came up with I think ERT should remain ERT and inserting an automatic blank _within_ the ERT is not a good idea. But wait: what is LyX saying about itself, WYSIWYM? Hey, if I put a whitespace after the end o

Re: Question on whitespace at the end of raw TeX - inserts

2008-12-22 Thread Steve Litt
On Monday 22 December 2008 11:58:24 am David Mertens wrote: > > What Dieter refers to is that TeX is interpreting a blank as the end of a > > command. I.e., "\TeX and friends" will be parsed as > > "TeXand > > friends". If you want a blank after the command, you must either write > > "\TeX\ and fri

Re: Question on whitespace at the end of raw TeX - inserts

2008-12-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"David Mertens" writes: > Perhaps we could add an option to ERT boxes to "respect spaces afer this > ert", in which case a space after the close of an ert would be replaced with > a '\ '? Do you really think that checking this box is easier than adding '\ ' at the end of your ERT? ERT is raw, and

Re: Question on whitespace at the end of raw TeX - inserts

2008-12-22 Thread David Mertens
> > What Dieter refers to is that TeX is interpreting a blank as the end of a > command. I.e., "\TeX and friends" will be parsed as > "TeXand > friends". If you want a blank after the command, you must either write > "\TeX\ and friends" or "\TeX{} and friends" (in ordinary LaTeX), and I > think > D

Re: Question on whitespace at the end of raw TeX - inserts

2008-12-22 Thread Steve Litt
I agree 100% with Jürgen here. As a guy who regularly does funny things with LyX, I don't need my job made harder by working around oddities put in as "user friendliness". And he's right, ERT is and always should be raw LaTeX. SteveT On Monday 22 December 2008 04:17:53 am Jürgen Spitzmüller wr

Re: Question on whitespace at the end of raw TeX - inserts

2008-12-22 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
David Mertens wrote: > I completely agree, for reasons that you pointed out, that Dieter's first > suggested solution would break many things.  However, I think you and I are > interpreting the second suggestion differently. > > Here's how I understand things.  Presently, lyx would translate the >

Re: Question on whitespace at the end of raw TeX - inserts

2008-12-22 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
I think LyX should not try to be more clever than the user. We know from other Word processors where this ends. Particularly, ERT is supposed to pass code _as is_ without any addition or modification. Doing clever tricks is impossible to get right. Dieter Jurzitza wrote: > 1.) put automatically

Re: Question on whitespace at the end of raw TeX - inserts

2008-12-21 Thread David Mertens
> > 1.) put automatically a blank as whitespace at the end of each TeX-insert > before closing it. > 2.) protect a whitespace follwing a TeX-insert if there is one - assume > that > the user intentionally puts a whitespace there. > Something tells me this has been discussed before, but since Diete

Question on whitespace at the end of raw TeX - inserts

2008-12-21 Thread Dieter Jurzitza
Dear listmembers, I stumbled over (and found the hint in the documentation) that you are forced to add a whitespace at the end of any raw TeX-insert. I understand that the TeX - insert is not encapsulated, i. e. it is intended to have impact on LyX code that follows. However I would like to ask