Matej Cepl schrieb:
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 12:13:17AM +0200, Robin Turner wrote:
Am I alone in liking the lightness of Computer Modern? I often print
out CM documents at 600dpi and I like the almost ethereal quality. In
Etheral quality is somehow heavy on my eyes (although my eyesigh
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 12:13:17AM +0200, Robin Turner wrote:
> Am I alone in liking the lightness of Computer Modern? I often print
> out CM documents at 600dpi and I like the almost ethereal quality. In
Etheral quality is somehow heavy on my eyes (although my eyesight
is perfect), so that I h
> so the requirements are different). Call me a Knuth fanatic, but CM
> is still the most aesthetically pleasing font I've ever seen (I'm not
Couldn't agree more with you Robin.. and CM is the only font I use.. cos
the output on screen is great and cos I can live with the lighter output
on my 600
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 12:13:17AM +0200, Robin Turner wrote:
> Nirmal Govind wrote:
> >>Or install the cm-super fonts, an (almost) complete type 1 replacement
> >>of the computer modern fonts:
> >>http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/ps-type1/cm-super/
> >>
> >>Jürgen.
> >>
> >
> >
> >I just did
Nirmal Govind wrote:
Or install the cm-super fonts, an (almost) complete type 1 replacement
of the computer modern fonts:
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/ps-type1/cm-super/
Jürgen.
I just did this (warning: cm-super package is a pretty big file ~ 65MB
in rpm format) and yes, the PDF out
> Or install the cm-super fonts, an (almost) complete type 1 replacement
> of the computer modern fonts:
> http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/ps-type1/cm-super/
>
> Jürgen.
>
I just did this (warning: cm-super package is a pretty big file ~ 65MB
in rpm format) and yes, the PDF output on scree
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 07:13:30AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 07:53:18PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > pslatex is obsolete!
>
> I wonder whether we should set up some article layout
> especially for .pdf generation. Remembering which package is
> prefered and which is o
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 07:53:18PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> pslatex is obsolete!
I wonder whether we should set up some article layout especially for .pdf
generation. Remembering which package is prefered and which is obsolete
is a bit tricky.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom
Herbert Voss wrote:
> pslatex is obsolete!
> use instead
>
> \usepackage{mathptmx}% instead of package times
> \usepackage[scaled=0.9]{helvet} % or [scaled=0.92], if you like
>
> or
>
> \usepackage{mathpazo};
> \usepackage{palatino};
Or install the cm-super fonts, an (almost) complete type 1 rep
Kayvan A. Sylvan schrieb:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 11:20:38AM -0300, German Poo Caaman~o wrote:
El mié, 06-11-2002 a las 11:05, Pierre Lescanne escribió:
In the extended manual, several tricks are suggested to get good
displays in Acroread. I tried them, none worked. However since I use
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 11:20:38AM -0300, German Poo Caaman~o wrote:
> El mié, 06-11-2002 a las 11:05, Pierre Lescanne escribió:
> > In the extended manual, several tricks are suggested to get good
> > displays in Acroread. I tried them, none worked. However since I use
> > times font, I have inc
El mié, 06-11-2002 a las 11:05, Pierre Lescanne escribió:
> In the extended manual, several tricks are suggested to get good
> displays in Acroread. I tried them, none worked. However since I use
> times font, I have included in the preamble, \usepackage{times} it
> works pretty fine. This could
In the extended manual, several tricks are suggested to get good
displays in Acroread. I tried them, none worked. However since I use
times font, I have included in the preamble, \usepackage{times} it
works pretty fine. This could be suggested in the documentation.
Pierre
13 matches
Mail list logo
