Rich Shepard wrote:
Why is it that numbered sectioning commands appear both in a
ToC and on the fancy headers, but their unnumbered versions don't? I know
this is a LaTeX action, but I'm wondering why it's this way.
That's the way the standard latex classes are! Only the numbered types
get i
On Friday 23 June 2006 23:03, Rich Shepard wrote:
>Why is it that numbered sectioning commands appear both in a
> ToC and on the fancy headers, but their unnumbered versions don't? I know
> this is a LaTeX action, but I'm wondering why it's this way.
I guess that is by design. :-)
The star
Why is it that numbered sectioning commands appear both in a
ToC and on the fancy headers, but their unnumbered versions don't? I know
this is a LaTeX action, but I'm wondering why it's this way.
I can see unnumbered sections in the frontmatter of a book or report, but
to not have headers wit
