On Tuesday 18 December 2001 12:02, Steve wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 04:41:40PM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > > John, I read the url above. While I don't agree with the premise,
> > > perhaps you could [or someone] explain how to set up mutt to reply to
> > > the group. Usually
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 04:41:40PM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> >
> > John, I read the url above. While I don't agree with the premise, perhaps
> > you could [or someone] explain how to set up mutt to reply to the group.
> > Usually in mutt one is given the choice.
> >
> > I've set
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Monday 17 December 2001 11:38, John Levon wrote:
> > We really need a
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >.org list I think ;)
> >
> > regards
> > john
>
> Needless to say, the preceding email address doesn't work, but those of us
> believing the list is a better
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 05:39:24PM +0100, Guenter Milde wrote:
> I can live with the present setting.
>
> One point still (after reading the abovementioned page). "Reply to all" will
> automatically give the sender two copies ... at least if he/she is
> subscribed to the list.
so use list-reply
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 14:55:11 + wrote John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:52:18AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> > IMHO life would be easier if the default reply were to the list. Such a
> > default would encourage a wider information sharing.
>
> In the life of a mai
>
> John, I read the url above. While I don't agree with the premise, perhaps
> you could [or someone] explain how to set up mutt to reply to the group.
> Usually in mutt one is given the choice.
>
> I've set up mutt to use the group reply and/or reply, however it doesn't
> appear to work for th
Steve writes:
Surely people replying to the list would be [as Steve Litt pointed
out] encourage better dissemination of information.
Please ... could we stop discussing mailing-list mechanics on this
list? I actually prefer not seeing every reply to every query. But
preferences aside,
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 02:55:11PM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:52:18AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> > IMHO life would be easier if the default reply were to the list. Such a
> > default would encourage a wider information sharing.
>
> In the life of a mailing list, the
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:52:18AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Monday 17 December 2001 04:43, Guenter Milde wrote:
> > On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 00:39:42 +0100 wrote thomas schönhoff
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > This is because people adress their mailss primarily to people who
> > > started a thread
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:52:18AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> IMHO life would be easier if the default reply were to the list. Such a
> default would encourage a wider information sharing.
In the life of a mailing list, there will occasionally be moments when
someone suggested using list reply
On Monday 17 December 2001 04:43, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 00:39:42 +0100 wrote thomas schönhoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > This is because people adress their mailss primarily to people who
> > started a thread and secondly to this user-list.(BTW these people
> > receive this mes
On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 00:39:42 +0100 wrote thomas schönhoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is because people adress their mailss primarily to people who
> started a thread and secondly to this user-list.(BTW these people
> receive this message twice!)
> Therefore I used to find a mess in my mailbox
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 12:39:42AM +0100, thomas schönhoff wrote:
> this is quite a bit OT. I regularily run into troubles using my
> Mailfilters (serveral for LyX and others) in Mozilla 0.9.6.
>
> This is because people adress their mailss primarily to people who
> started a thread and second
Hey,
this is quite a bit OT. I regularily run into troubles using my
Mailfilters (serveral for LyX and others) in Mozilla 0.9.6.
This is because people adress their mailss primarily to people who
started a thread and secondly to this user-list.(BTW these people
receive this message twice!)
Th
14 matches
Mail list logo