Michael Lapsley wrote:
I tried useing this approach, but it showed that I do not really
understand how it works. Why does [EMAIL PROTECTED] detect an argument on
'[', given that \section is called as \section{text}?
I am trying to detect the empty case for item to set a flag to use
later.
I tried
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 06:50:32AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> see attchewd example (LyX 1.3.5)
>
> Herbert
>
Thanks Herbert, that is perfect!
I tried useing this approach, but it showed that I do not really
understand how it works. Why does [EMAIL PROTECTED] detect an argument on
'[', given t
Michael Lapsley wrote:
Thanks for that: but what I am having more difficulty with is persuading
the section number to appear after the name, not before it, ie not
1. Section
but
Section 1
Any ideas?
see attchewd example (LyX 1.3.5)
Herbert
--
http://TeXnik.de/
http://PSTricks.de/
ftp://ftp.dante.
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:30:41PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> TOC-navigation will also work with AMS's section format. To enable
> sectional numbering, you can add the following line to the preamble
>
> \numberwithin{equation}{section}
Thanks for that: but what I am having more difficulty with i
Michael Lapsley wrote:
I want to be able to take advantage of the TOC navigation while
maintaining sectional equation numbering (working with ams article).
TOC-navigation will also work with AMS's section format. To enable
sectional numbering, you can add the following line to the preamble
\numbe
Hello all,
Does anyone know the neatest way to modify section so that the
result is instead of <1. Section> ?
I want to be able to take advantage of the TOC navigation while
maintaining sectional equation numbering (working with ams article).
I don't use anything lower than section. seccntform
