On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> Is there really no easy way to have tlmgr alongside
> Debian/Ubuntu-provided TeXLive binaries? Regards
> Liviu
>
> PS For those concerned, there is an Ubuntu Idea [1] where you can vote
> on this issue.
> [1] http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/id
Dear all
Even if it's quite off-topic for lyx-users, re-opening an old discussion.
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Sven Hoexter wrote:
>> The Problem is that you often end up with a mess because some third party
>> installers/package manager overwrite files of your di
On 2010-08-20, Julien Rioux wrote:
> On 20/08/2010 10:49 AM, Rob Oakes wrote:
>> Which brings me to the question in the front of my mind. Should we
>> create another Ubuntu/Debian package for LyX that doesn't require the
>> system LaTeX packages?
Seconded. At least with the internal HTML export,
Rob Oakes wrote:
> > Sure. But you lose one of the most important features of TeXLive:
> > immediate update to the most recent packages from CTAN.
>
> I think it really depends on your needs.
I could not agree more.
> The question for the user
> becomes, how often do you really need to update
On 20/08/2010 10:49 AM, Rob Oakes wrote:
This is how, after all, python packages are managed (through setup.py). But I
agree if you really need this, advanced users can figure it out by themselves.
I can only dream.
I'm not sure that it's that simple. (Or if it is, I really need to learn more
> This is how, after all, python packages are managed (through setup.py). But I
> agree if you really need this, advanced users can figure it out by
> themselves. I can only dream.
I'm not sure that it's that simple. (Or if it is, I really need to learn more
about packaging!) I maintain a py
On Aug 20, 2010, at 7:33 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Sure. But you lose one of the most important features of TeXLive: immediate
> update to the most recent packages from CTAN.
I think it really depends on your needs. The question for the user becomes,
how often do you really need to upda
On 20/08/2010 7:29 AM, Sven Hoexter wrote:
The Problem is that you often end up with a mess because some third party
installers/package manager overwrite files of your distribution packages.
And a few weeks later a new update for your distribution arrives and
replaces some of the newer files with
2010/8/20 Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Sure. But you lose one of the most important features of TeXLive: immediate
> update to the most recent packages from CTAN.
But that strategy is equal for *buntu itself. You are frozen to
packages version coming with *buntu release. The only exception was
minor ve
Sven Hoexter wrote:
> The Problem is that you often end up with a mess because some third party
> installers/package manager overwrite files of your distribution packages.
> And a few weeks later a new update for your distribution arrives and
> replaces some of the newer files with another older bu
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:53:32PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Liviu Andronic wrote:
> > > FYI> Although this is true, you cannot use the texlive 2009 package
> > > manager when texlive 2009 is installed from the ubuntu repository.
> >
> > That's very strange. Why would they block this?
>
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> > FYI> Although this is true, you cannot use the texlive 2009 package
> > manager when texlive 2009 is installed from the ubuntu repository.
>
> That's very strange. Why would they block this?
The argument, AFAIU, is that the distributors do not want yet another package
m
I have had the same question about the TexLive package manager (tlmgr)
for a while now. When you install tl2009 on Windows you get tlmgr. In
Linux you don't (unless you install from sources, apparently).
Ehud Kaplan
On 8/20/2010 6:23 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:40 AM
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Julien Rioux
wrote:
> FYI> Although this is true, you cannot use the texlive 2009 package manager
> when texlive 2009 is installed from the ubuntu repository.
>
That's very strange. Why would they block this?
Liviu
--
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienet
Hello Rob
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Rob Oakes wrote:
> PS, if there is interest from the developer/user community, I would also be
> happy to create a PPA for the latest alpha of LyX 2 (or we on the betas
> yet?). To prevent it from destroying your system, though, I would need to
> patch
On 19/08/2010 7:28 PM, Rob Oakes wrote:
However, Ubuntu updated the version of LaTeX to TeXLive 2009 in 10.04.
FYI> Although this is true, you cannot use the texlive 2009 package
manager when texlive 2009 is installed from the ubuntu repository.
--
Julien
Hi Fareed,
Does this new LyX package depend on the the TexLive in Ubuntu's
repositories? Ubuntu's version of TexLive was out-of-date for a long
time, so I installed TexLive 2009 directly from its net installer, to
use its latex package manager. As a result I've had to install any latex
related p
On 08/19/2010 04:24 AM, Ignacio García wrote:
> I wanted to provide a bit of an update to my adventures with Ubuntu packaging
> (insofar as they are related to LyX).
> I've spoken with the Ubuntu developers, and they have granted our request to
> include 1.6.7 in the next version of Ubuntu (Mave
Rob Oakes wrote:
> I wanted to provide a bit of an update to my adventures with Ubuntu packaging
> (insofar as they are related to LyX).
> I've spoken with the Ubuntu developers, and they have granted our request to
> include 1.6.7 in the next version of Ubuntu (Maverick Meerkat, 10.10).
> Pac
2010/8/17 Pavel Sanda :
> Rob Oakes wrote:
>> Dear LyX Users and Developers,
>
> firstly, thanks to care about ubuntu repos. the most frequent bug report
> is the combination of lyx 1.6.5 & qt-4.6 in lynx; dont know if buntu's
> policies permit this but it would be great if all buntu users got 1.6
Rob Oakes wrote:
> Dear LyX Users and Developers,
firstly, thanks to care about ubuntu repos. the most frequent bug report
is the combination of lyx 1.6.5 & qt-4.6 in lynx; dont know if buntu's
policies permit this but it would be great if all buntu users got 1.6.7
automatically updated through
Dear LyX Users and Developers,
I wanted to provide a bit of an update to my adventures with Ubuntu
packaging (insofar as they are related to LyX).
I've spoken with the Ubuntu developers, and they have granted our
request to include 1.6.7 in the next version of Ubuntu (Maverick
Meerkat, 10.1
22 matches
Mail list logo
