On 15-May-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> If you have 2 multicolumn cells side by side, and you want a double vertical
> rule then the latex code should be
> \multicolumn{1}{c||}{Foo}&
> \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Bar}&
>
> As I said before, you should not put | before the column type letter!
>
> Currently,
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 09:51:11AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 14-May-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > No you don't!
> > See also the mail I sent to lyx-devel.
>
> #:O) well before crying out you should try the stuff maybe, don't you think?
> And I'm right (and I did try it out;)
>
>
On 14-May-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> No you don't!
> See also the mail I sent to lyx-devel.
#:O) well before crying out you should try the stuff maybe, don't you think?
And I'm right (and I did try it out;)
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-.
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 09:36:43AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 14-May-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > The problem is that you should never use left vertical rule in a multicol
> > cell (i.e. '\multicolumn{1}{|c}', except for the first column of the table.
> > So the solution is to use right
On 14-May-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> The problem is that you should never use left vertical rule in a multicol
> cell (i.e. '\multicolumn{1}{|c}', except for the first column of the table.
> So the solution is to use right vertical rules '\multicolumn{1}{c|}'
> See the attached file.
Yes and no.
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 09:08:49PM -0400, Kevin Gross wrote:
> OK, that worked well. Now just a tiny problem remains. In the attached
> file, you will notice that the cell lines are a bit thicker for the first row
> than the other rows. Not sure why. At any rate, it is definitely good
> eno
OK, that worked well. Now just a tiny problem remains. In the attached
file, you will notice that the cell lines are a bit thicker for the first row
than the other rows. Not sure why. At any rate, it is definitely good
enough for me! Thanks for all your clever help.
Kevin
On Sunday 13 Ma
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 03:20:11PM -0400, Kevin Gross wrote:
> Your suggestion worked perfectly, well almost perfectly. Attached is a
> sample LyX file containing a table using your trick. It works perfectly for
> the numbers in the table. I disabled the trick for the 1st row by making
> eac
Your suggestion worked perfectly, well almost perfectly. Attached is a
sample LyX file containing a table using your trick. It works perfectly for
the numbers in the table. I disabled the trick for the 1st row by making
each a multicolumn cell and manually changing the column alignment to "c
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 10:35:01PM -0400, Kevin Gross wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've got a set of tabular data. A considerable amount of the numbers are
> negative. I can easily create a table of the appropriate dimensions in lyx
> and paste in my data from an editor. However, in the final output, t
Hi all,
I've got a set of tabular data. A considerable amount of the numbers are
negative. I can easily create a table of the appropriate dimensions in lyx
and paste in my data from an editor. However, in the final output, the
negative numbers are preceded by a dash instead of the more appropr
11 matches
Mail list logo
