On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 09:49:30AM +0300, Tuukka Toivonen wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2001, Kathryn Andersen wrote:
>
> > I have now also hacked the tex2pdf script to convert the eps files to
> > PNG rather than PDF, using the convert program which is part of
> > ImageMagick.
>
> That might be good
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Kathryn Andersen wrote:
> I have now also hacked the tex2pdf script to convert the eps files to
> PNG rather than PDF, using the convert program which is part of
> ImageMagick.
That might be good choice for you, but generally it is not. Vector image
graphics should _not_ be
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 10:56:51AM +0300, Tuukka Toivonen wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2001, Kathryn Andersen wrote:
>
> > in the resultant PDF file, the monochrome pictures are fine, but the
> > greyscale ones are scrambled nonsense. But when I look at the actual
> > greyscale PDF files of those pic
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Kathryn Andersen wrote:
> in the resultant PDF file, the monochrome pictures are fine, but the
> greyscale ones are scrambled nonsense. But when I look at the actual
> greyscale PDF files of those pictures, they are fine.
I don't know what's wrong or how to actually fix it.
I have a mixture of different graphics in my document, some are
monochrome, some are greyscale. When I use ps2pdf to create a PDF file
from Postscript output, everything is fine. When I use pdflatex (after
having created the requisite PDF files of the graphics, to be included)
in the resultant P
