Re: Dutch 'trema' not handled as required in hyphenation

2023-05-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Sonntag, dem 28.05.2023 um 13:20 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > Polyglossia doesn't support this yet (worth a feature request > at https://github.com/reutenauer/polyglossia/issues) FWIW polyglossia just received this feature for the next release (probably due early next month): https://git

Re: Dutch 'trema' not handled as required in hyphenation

2023-05-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Sonntag, dem 28.05.2023 um 11:16 +0200 schrieb R. H. van der Gaag: > Hi there fellow LyXers, > I noticed that the Dutch ‘trema’ (the dots above ü ä ï ö ë) isn’t > removed when the word is hyphenated directly before the letter with > the trema (it should, to comply with grammar rules. In LaTeX, 

Dutch 'trema' not handled as required in hyphenation

2023-05-28 Thread R. H. van der Gaag
Hi there fellow LyXers, I noticed that the Dutch ‘trema’ (the dots above ü ä ï ö ë) isn’t removed when the word is hyphenated directly before the letter with the trema (it should, to comply with grammar rules. In LaTeX, \usepackage{newunicodechar} \makeatletter \newunicodechar{ë}{\@trema e} \ne