I think this is fixed in http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/32570.
Sorry, but I am not a developer, so I cannot really decipher the
content of that page. Do you mean that the bug is fixed in 1.6.5?
I mean that it is fixed yes, but I'm afraid that my time-travelling
capabilities are a
Hi Vincent,
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
wrote:
>>Second, when I use any sort of font formatting inside
>>a table, say underlining or italics, and then move the
>>cursor to another cell in the table, LyX assumes that
>>the formatting for the text in next cell wil
>Second, when I use any sort of font formatting inside
>a table, say underlining or italics, and then move the
>cursor to another cell in the table, LyX assumes that
>the formatting for the text in next cell will be the
>same as the last formatting I used.
I think this is fixed in http://www.lyx.
Maria Gouskova wrote:
Dear LyX users,
First, configuration: Mac OS 10.6.2, LyX 1.6.4.2.
Second, when I use any sort of font formatting inside a table, say
underlining or italics, and then move the cursor to another cell in
the table, LyX assumes that the formatting for the text in next cell
wil
Oh, sorry--forgot to mention that this "sticky formatting" persists
even when cutting and pasting or copying objects between cells. As in,
select an italicized letter, cut it, paste it to another cell, and
then try to type in a different cell--the text will be in italics.
This doesn't happen outsid
Dear LyX users,
First, configuration: Mac OS 10.6.2, LyX 1.6.4.2.
Second, when I use any sort of font formatting inside a table, say
underlining or italics, and then move the cursor to another cell in
the table, LyX assumes that the formatting for the text in next cell
will be the same as the las
