I figured out the problem: on the Mac LyX stores the UserDir under
~/Library/Application Support/LyX-. I still had version 2.0 and
was editing my layout file in that folder, rather than the one in the 2.1
folder. I now works as expected.
Thanks again.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Jürgen Spit
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Is it possible that LyX caches layout files somewhere and it's not picking
> > up a new version (I'm on OS X Mavericks with LyX 2.1.2.1 for what it's
> > worth).
>
> No. You are sure that you do not have a copy of the layout file which is
> used by LyX?
Also assure
Ernesto Posse wrote:
> That's exactly what I tried but got exactly the same result as using
> 'post:'. I think that for some reason, when I reconfigure and restart, LyX
> is not catching the changes in the layout file. I've tried running it from
> the command-line with different debug options, but
Thanks. Comments inline below.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> 2014-11-13 15:38 GMT+01:00 Ernesto Posse:
>
>> Thanks. That is what I want to achieve and your example does accomplish
>> this, but I don't understand why using the first form of "Argument"
>> declaration
2014-11-13 15:38 GMT+01:00 Ernesto Posse:
> Thanks. That is what I want to achieve and your example does accomplish
> this, but I don't understand why using the first form of "Argument"
> declaration in the layout file, without 'post:', the second argument to the
> command is always the text from
Thanks. That is what I want to achieve and your example does accomplish
this, but I don't understand why using the first form of "Argument"
declaration in the layout file, without 'post:', the second argument to the
command is always the text from the work area, this is,
\command{arg1}{work area t
2014-11-12 21:14 GMT+01:00 Ernesto Posse:
> Thanks. That's quite nice, but it doesn't work quite as expected.
>
> I tried the two forms, arguments with and without 'post:' and I get the
> same result: the second argument of the command is the "body" (the text
> that follows all arguments) and "Man
Thanks. That's quite nice, but it doesn't work quite as expected.
I tried the two forms, arguments with and without 'post:' and I get the
same result: the second argument of the command is the "body" (the text
that follows all arguments) and "Mandatory 0" seems to be ignored (the
generated argumen
2014-11-12 20:01 GMT+01:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller:
>
> However, if you use LyX 2.1, you do not need an own command, since the
> command in question is possible with the help of the new argument syntax:
>
> Style Category
> InPreamble1
> LabelTypeStatic
> LabelString"Category"
>
2014-11-12 19:18 GMT+01:00 Ernesto Posse:
> Hi. I'm trying to define my own layout file and I ran into this situation:
> I need a style whose latex command must go into the preamble (as required
> by the underlying latex class), but I need to define my own command for the
> style because the one p
Hi. I'm trying to define my own layout file and I ran into this situation:
I need a style whose latex command must go into the preamble (as required
by the underlying latex class), but I need to define my own command for the
style because the one provided by the base class doesn't work well with th
11 matches
Mail list logo
