On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:18:18AM -0600, Tim J. Garrett spake thusly:
> Hello Martin,
>
> These are the layout files I have. It does look like something may be remiss in what
> I currently
> have working, based on comparisons to what you show.
>
> Thankyou for you guidance.
>
> Tim
ok, I s
Hello Martin,
These are the layout files I have. It does look like something may be remiss in what I currently
have working, based on comparisons to what you show.
Thankyou for you guidance.
Tim
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 03:33:16PM -0600, Tim J. Garrett spake thusly:
The pr
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 03:33:16PM -0600, Tim J. Garrett spake thusly:
> The proper AGU files seem to be in textclass.lst
>
> "agums" "article" "article (AGU ms)" "false"
This looks slightly different from what I have. It should look
"agums" "aguplus" "article (AGU++) manuscript" "false"
(but
The proper AGU files seem to be in textclass.lst
"agums" "article" "article (AGU ms)" "false"
"aguplus" "jgrga" "article (AGU)" "false"
"jgrga" "aguplus" "article (AGU++) JGR" "true"
Since the last shows up in my list of document classes but the first two are listed as unavailable
it seems that so
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 11:23:36AM -0600, Tim J. Garrett spake thusly:
> Looks like texhash did its job. ls-R contains:
>
>
> ./tex/latex/base:
> agu10.sty
> agu11.sty
> agu2001.cls
> agu2001.sty
> agu.bst
> agufull.bst
> agums.sty
> aguplus.cls
>
> texhash was run with out options.
>
> Thank
Looks like texhash did its job. ls-R contains:
./tex/latex/base:
agu10.sty
agu11.sty
agu2001.cls
agu2001.sty
agu.bst
agufull.bst
agums.sty
aguplus.cls
texhash was run with out options.
Thanks again
Tim
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 12:04:21PM -0600, Tim J. Garrett spake thusly:
T
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 12:04:21PM -0600, Tim J. Garrett spake thusly:
> This is what I have:
> >/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/agu10.sty
> > /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/agu11.sty
> > /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/agu2001.cls
> > /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/agu2001.sty
> > /usr/sh
This is what I have:
>/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/agu10.sty
> /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/agu11.sty
> /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/agu2001.cls
> /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/agu2001.sty
> /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/agu.bst
> /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/agufull.bst
> /usr/shar
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 04:06:55PM -0600, Tim J. Garrett spake thusly:
> Hello,
...
> Now it seems in version 1.3.4, that this has been simplified, and that these classes
> have been
> formally added to LyX, however these show up in the document class list as
>
> Unavailable: article (AGU)
This is what I found from Edit->Reconfigure that seemed vaguely relevant:
+checking for document class agums [article, /home/tgarrett/LyX/STYFILES/agums.
+checking for document class aguplus [jgrga, /home/tgarrett/LyX/STYFILES/aguplu
-obviously my files (not my truncation)
and
+checking for docu
Tim J. Garrett wrote:
> Now it seems in version 1.3.4, that this has been simplified, and
> that these classes have been formally added to LyX, however these
> show up in the document class list as
>
> Unavailable: article (AGU)
>
> and
>
> Unvailable: article (AGU ms)
>
> How exactly does one
Hello,
I have been successfully using the AGU plus and AGU ms classes with a little (a lot) of much
appreciated assistance from Martin Vermeer and Angus Leeming. However, it has required some trickery
that includes exporting the lyx document as latex, and running a shell script on the latex docu
12 matches
Mail list logo
