Re: xforms 0.89 (was: Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7 compile problem)

2001-01-12 Thread Paul E Johnson
RPMS for xforms 88.1, which I used to build lyx on RH7, can be obtained in the redhat contrib directory. There's a fill mirror at ftp://ftp.varesearch.com. go to /pub/mirrors/redhat/contrib/i386 for xforms and xforms-devel. DOn't forget you need the newest RedHat updates for glibc and gcc to ma

Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7 compile problem

2001-01-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Svante" == Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Svante> Jean-Marc, Sorry I did not dig deep enough into the web pages. Svante> I was only looking to the lyx http://www.lyx.org/ and Svante> lyx-devel http://www.devel.lyx.org/ pages and did not find a Svante> link to the archives there

Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7 compile problem

2001-01-04 Thread Svante Signell
Jean-Marc, Sorry I did not dig deep enough into the web pages. I was only looking to the lyx http://www.lyx.org/ and lyx-devel http://www.devel.lyx.org/ pages and did not find a link to the archives there. Did not expect to find it at the internet resources page. Also I found no link from the dev

Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7 compile problem

2001-01-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Svante" == Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Svante> What do you think about having links to the mail archives at Svante> the LyX web pages, not only to the mailing addresses Svante> [EMAIL PROTECTED]? Did you really read the page http://www.lyx.org/internet/mailing.php3 ? It

Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7 compile problem

2001-01-03 Thread Svante Signell
Allan Rae writes: > On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Svante Signell wrote: > > > BTW: Are the lyx lists archived somewhere? A lot of problems > > can be solved by referring to older postings. There was a lot of > > disussion recently about the X11 header file defining Object. > > http://www.mail-archi

Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7 compile problem

2001-01-03 Thread Svante Signell
See below. Lars Gullik Bjønnes writes: > Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Lars Gullik Bjønnes writes: > | > Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > > | > | Even though LyX now compiles, I have problems with LyX dumping core at > | > | start up. Lars, has this

Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7 compile problem

2001-01-03 Thread Andre Juffer
Norm Matloff wrote: > For those of us who are not skilled at installing gcc, could you tell us > the easiest way to install 2.95, without running into unforeseen > problems with libraries, paths, etc? Should we download an RPM? What we (that is, the system manager) did was simply remove the

xforms 0.89 (was: Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7 compile problem)

2001-01-02 Thread Wai-Sun Chia
Allan is correct. Stay the hell away from the xform RPM in RH's powertools directory. Compiling Lyx against that (xform-0.88-15) will bomb! Refer to my previous email. What I did was to build my own RPM for 0.89. Here is the .spec file for your enjoyment... For the RH newbies: 1. Copy xforms.spe

Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7 compile problem

2001-01-02 Thread Allan Rae
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Svante Signell wrote: > > Sorry, my replies should also go to the users list. Damned mailer. > > The xforms version in rawhide/powertools directory is still 0.88-15, where > the following change has to be made to forms.h: Comment out > . > > Even though LyX now compiles, I hav

Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7 compile problem

2001-01-02 Thread Svante Signell
Sorry, my replies should also go to the users list. Damned mailer. The xforms version in rawhide/powertools directory is still 0.88-15, where the following change has to be made to forms.h: Comment out . Even though LyX now compiles, I have problems with LyX dumping core at start up. Lars, has

Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7 compile problem

2001-01-02 Thread Svante Signell
Sorry, my replies should also go to the users list. Damned mailer. Lars Gullik Bjønnes writes: > Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Even though LyX now compiles, I have problems with LyX dumping core at > | start up. Lars, has this been solved recently? > > And you are sur

Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7 compile problem

2001-01-02 Thread Wai-Sun Chia
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote: > > FUD, gcc-2.96 works just perfect. > Lars, you're absolutely right. gcc-2.96 are so much better in compiling C++ stuff (although the one shipped with RH7 is pretty crappy, which I believed was 2.96-54). > > Your XForms dist is too old. Get a newer one. > (but

Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7 compile problem

2001-01-02 Thread nbecker
Why not try the new update to RH7.0 gcc-2.96-69?

Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7 compile problem

2001-01-02 Thread Norm Matloff
For those of us who are not skilled at installing gcc, could you tell us the easiest way to install 2.95, without running into unforeseen problems with libraries, paths, etc? Should we download an RPM? Norm Matloff On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 11:39:19AM +0200, Andre Juffer wrote: > > > Wai-Sun Ch

Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7 compile problem

2001-01-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Juffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Wai-Sun Chia wrote: | | > Hello, | > Just downloaded the latest lyx-1.1.6pre3 and tried to compile it on my | > RH7 system. This is updated frequently from Rawhide. Specifically this | > system is running: | > gcc-2.96-69 | > glibc-2.2-9 | > binutils-2.

Re: 1.1.6pre3 & RH7 compile problem

2001-01-02 Thread Andre Juffer
Wai-Sun Chia wrote: > Hello, > Just downloaded the latest lyx-1.1.6pre3 and tried to compile it on my > RH7 system. This is updated frequently from Rawhide. Specifically this > system is running: > > gcc-2.96-69 > glibc-2.2-9 > binutils-2.10.1.0.2-1 > libsigc++-1.0.1-1 gcc-2.96 is a develop

1.1.6pre3 & RH7 compile problem

2001-01-01 Thread Wai-Sun Chia
Hello, Just downloaded the latest lyx-1.1.6pre3 and tried to compile it on my RH7 system. This is updated frequently from Rawhide. Specifically this system is running: gcc-2.96-69 glibc-2.2-9 binutils-2.10.1.0.2-1 libsigc++-1.0.1-1 My configure is: ./configure --prefix=/usr --with-pspell As I