Re: \bar{x} = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n}

2001-10-29 Thread Michael Abshoff
On Sat, 27 Oct 2001, Jacobo Myerston wrote: > Hi, > > I want to write the classical statistic mean with \bar{x} = > \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n}, but that doesn't display like I > expected. When I introduce \frac the subscript n and _{i=1} display > on the side o

Re: \bar{x} = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n}

2001-10-28 Thread Jacobo Myerston
Thanks Renaud, M-m-l works great. > > >Write instead >\bar{x} = \frac{\limit\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n} >\limit will tell LaTeX to put the sub and superscript under and over the sum, >there is a shortcut in LyX : put the cursor just before the sum and do M-m l >you will see the limits move magically o

Re: \bar{x} = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n}

2001-10-28 Thread Renaud MICHEL
Le Dimanche 28 Octobre 2001 01:38, vous avez écrit : > Hi, > > I want to write the classical statistic mean with \bar{x} = > \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n}, but that doesn't display like I > expected. When I introduce \frac the subscript n and _{i=1} display > on the

\bar{x} = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n}

2001-10-27 Thread Jacobo Myerston
Hi, I want to write the classical statistic mean with \bar{x} = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n}, but that doesn't display like I expected. When I introduce \frac the subscript n and _{i=1} display on the side of the sum and not above and under the sum. Is there another way to do that? --

\bar{x} = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n}

2001-10-27 Thread Jacobo Myerston
Hi, I want to write the classical statistic mean with \bar{x} = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n}, but that doesn't display like I expected. When I introduce \frac the subscript n and _{i=1} display on the side of the sum and not above and under the sum. Is there another way to do that? --