You should note that there are approximately six versions of en-gb, at
least one of which approximates Australian standard use. Better
results could be had he you lobbied Macquarie Dictionary for an aspell
en-au
On 2/19/09, Doug Laidlaw wrote:
> Further to this, I installed Version 1.6.1 from the
Does anyone else in the Humanities have
anything to report about biblatex + lyx?
thanks,
Sam Russell.
--
I will give you Tacos, such Tacos as you have never seen.
Oh-one-one-eight-nine-nine-nine Eight-eight-one-nine-nine,
nine-one-ONE-nine-seven-two-fi~ve. Three
On 19/06/06, Jeremy Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For some time I have been evaluating Lyx as an academic word processor, but
find it wanting in a few critical areas.
Judging from the number of posts to this lists, citations and bibliographies
are a major issue. There is no easy to use
metho
Chris wrote,
> I´ would like to use Lyx (1.3.6-1 for Windows) and the package multibib
> together to get three different bibliographys, but it dosnt work.
I'm in a similar situation with jurabib and multiple bibliographies.
(History requires Archival documents, Primary and Secondary sources to
be
On 25/10/05, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Knuth also argues in METAFONT that slanted will make it easier for
> > typeface designers to produce multiple faces from a single style.
>
> So can they get a slanted face out of an MM font?
This is my recollection of Knuth's assertion[1]. T
(I assumed the Reply-to: would be the list)
On 24/10/05, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any typographical reason why you might want slanted instead of
> italic or vice-versa?
In the original edition describing TeX Knuth is very very strident
about the need for slanted fonts, the wave
