Hello all,
How can I get double sub(sup)script, like the one in
attached file. One solution I tried (crude though) by taking
2x1 matrix in subscript but that takes much space.
Any better solution???
Thanks in advance.
Regards
S. K. Tomar
<>
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > Just one query, will this feature be same in subsequent
> > releases.
>
> I am not sure.
>
> On the 'pro' side: It behaves exactly as LaTeX does, whence it is
> easy to implement.
>
> On the 'contra' side: It is somewhat annoying and people who don't
> know LaTeX cer
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 11:24:34AM +0200, S.K. Tomar wrote:
> > I am facing one problem, when I am in mathmode, if I type
> > left (single) curly braces, it gives me both (left and
> > right) and if I try for only right one, it does noth
Hi!
I am facing one problem, when I am in mathmode, if I type
left (single) curly braces, it gives me both (left and
right) and if I try for only right one, it does nothing. Has
anyone also experienced the same and what is the solution.
Thanks in advance.
S K Tomar
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> Thanks very much indeed. And how to come to the main window
> without using mouse...
>
> ?
Just now Jean-Marc replied as ESC key and it works.
> > Further, will there be differenct .bind file for math and text... I
> > mean what does this "math" reflect here.
>
> That
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> S> Thanks very much indeed. And how to come to the main window without
> S> using mouse...
>
> Escape?
Thanks, it worked.
S K Tomar
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> M-x
Thanks very much indeed. And how to come to the main window
without using mouse...
> > and (2) keybindings
> not possible inside LyX. You need to put them manually in a .bind file...
>
> > possibly in my personal directory.
> ... like .lyx/bind/math.bind
And ho
Hi,
Surprisingly, I am not able to use minibuffer at all in
1.2.0. What can be the possibility and remedy???
Further, can anyone help me on how to define
(1) a math macro, and (2) keybindings
possibly in my personal directory.
Thanks in advance
S K Tomar
Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > But I have successfully used the lowercase letters in
> > \mathcal in earlier versions, say 1.1.5/6, whereas it simply
> > doesn't work now, no matter whether I use AMS-Math or not.
>
> No you didn't.
> Just try writting $\mathcal{a}$ in TeX mode and see what happens.
P
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > No, certainly not. I had a different output from "r" then
> > what I get with "R".
>
> Oh... but both "calligraphic"?
>
> Do you have a screenshot?
Yes, both "caligraphic".
Just now I did the following:
Open the .ps file in xv, selected the portion and saved in
.gif
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 11:11:11AM +0200, S.K. Tomar wrote:
> > But I have successfully used the lowercase letters in
> > \mathcal in earlier versions, say 1.1.5/6, whereas it simply
> > doesn't work now, no matter whether I use AMS-Math or
Dekel Tsur wrote:
> You can only have uppercase letter in calligraphic font.
But I have successfully used the lowercase letters in
\mathcal in earlier versions, say 1.1.5/6, whereas it simply
doesn't work now, no matter whether I use AMS-Math or not.
S K Tomar
Hi,
I am using 1.2.0 on SuSe 7.3.
When I use "Math Style and Fonts" from Math panel and choose
the "cal" option, this leads me to \nabla symbol for 'r'
input. Am I doing any mistake or this is a bug.
Thanks in advance.
S K Tomar
13 matches
Mail list logo
