On 07/06/11 13:59, Richard Heck wrote:
On 06/07/2011 02:48 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
What is the trick that permits (for example) a Frame environment to
contain other environments without the need to "increase the depth" of
the inserted environment?
Using an Inset instead of a Style.
Section 5
On 04/06/11 23:12, Guenter Milde wrote:
[...]
For this kind of environments, you use an Inset instead of a Style:
I thought an Inset was for character-level markup. I may have
misunderstood something here.
it shows as a box in the LyX buffer,
it is only leaved when you tell it, and
it allow
On 03/06/11 23:14, Richard Heck wrote:
On 06/03/2011 05:48 PM, Peter Flynn wrote:
[...]
Hmmm. That's what I did: insert a list. But there's nothing in the
Edit menu related to lists at that point. This is using a Beamer
layout file: does that disable some of this stuff?
No, it
On 03/06/11 13:25, Richard Heck wrote:
On 06/02/2011 07:35 PM, Peter Flynn wrote:
On 01/06/11 13:57, Richard Heck wrote:
How do I tell LyX that lists (for example; and much other stuff) is
permitted inside a Foo environment? Is there a setting or switch that
tells LyX to allow nested
On 01/06/11 13:57, Richard Heck wrote:
How do I tell LyX that lists (for example; and much other stuff) is
permitted inside a Foo environment? Is there a setting or switch that
tells LyX to allow nested environments globally, or does it have to be
done on an environment by environment basis?
Th
On 01/06/11 13:57, Richard Heck wrote:
[...]
How do I tell LyX that lists (for example; and much other stuff) is
permitted inside a Foo environment? Is there a setting or switch that
tells LyX to allow nested environments globally, or does it have to be
done on an environment by environment basis
I am having some trouble understanding how to implement a new
environment in an existing .layout file. The documentation covers the
principle, but not the detail, especially about how to enable other
environments (like lists) *inside* the one I am implementing, and how to
get LyX to prompt for
Stephen P. Harris wrote:
I read this description from an authoritative source (tug.org) and your
opinion is quite incoherent and inexperienced when compared to it.
I'm afraid we differ on various points from time to time.
The TeX Collection is self-described as having progressed to the point
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Saturday 10 September 2005 19:23, Peter Flynn wrote:
2. yum install lyx.
Aaaaggghhh! *Never*, never, never do this if you already have TeX.
Especially not if you have already carefully removed the outdated mess
that is the RH kludge of tetex, and replaced it
Pol wrote:
Hi,
I was not able to copy a file by drag and drop from konqueror into the
lyx editor, since the non-ascii character in the file name (an accented
letter, in my case) is erased during the procedure.
Is it possible to fix that?
Non-ASCII characters in URIs should not be used unenc
Stephen P. Harris wrote:
[me]
Previously: No matter, all is now serene.
Oh, how nice. I suppose you were able to get a good screenshot of LyX
--> View --> Tex Information --> Latex classes (*.cls) which displayed a
partial list of your installed classes?
It displayed the whole lot, includin
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Sorry, my wording was fuzzy. I don't have a working Linux box handy
these days, but I assume that LyX runs with the permissions of whatever
user is logged in. So if you can run latex directly, presumably when
you run the LyX configure script it has the same permissions.
Paul Smith wrote:
2. yum install lyx.
Aaaaggghhh! *Never*, never, never do this if you already have TeX.
Especially not if you have already carefully removed the outdated mess
that is the RH kludge of tetex, and replaced it with the real tetex from
the TeX Collection DVD.
yum fails to
Paul Smith wrote:
[me]
Is anyone out there using LyX on FC4?
I am using LyX on FC4 with no problem. The way I installed it was:
1. copied my own .lyx directory into my home directory;
2. yum install lyx.
Excellent! Never used yum before, so here goes. I wonder will it work
over the top of
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Peter Flynn wrote:
I just tried to install Lyx from the 1.3.6-1 RPMs.
It can't find the commands kpsewhich and texhash, which is weird
because they are both in the global path. The TeX is a new full
install from the
TeX Collection DVD.
How do I get around this? I
Paul Smith wrote:
On 9/9/05, Peter Flynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just tried to install Lyx from the 1.3.6-1 RPMs.
It can't find the commands kpsewhich and texhash, which is weird because
they are both in the global path. The TeX is a new full install from the
TeX Collection D
I just tried to install Lyx from the 1.3.6-1 RPMs.
It can't find the commands kpsewhich and texhash, which is weird because
they are both in the global path. The TeX is a new full install from the
TeX Collection DVD.
How do I get around this? Is the postinstall script SUing to some
strange UID
17 matches
Mail list logo
