[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Siterer "Leuven, E." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
1. The current line settings
2. A blank tabular (ie no lines set)
Given those options I would go with 2. It would require the least number
of changes to get what I want.
If it is possible to make a third option I would like
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
I use several .bib-files in the BibTeX references at the end of my document.
They are all quite large (beyond 1000 entries each). Some references are
listed in two or more of the bibfiles and have the same marks (e.g. AMC+99).
Does somebody know, how a particular refer
Hello lyxers
IIRC few days ago someone asked for a glossary support. I quickly
checked the archives and it seemed to me that nobody hasn't point out a
gloss based solution. Sorry if someone did it.
As far as my knowledge is concerned one of the most useful packages
regarding glossaries is glos
Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 06:32:09PM +0100, Oscar L?pez wrote:
postscript and pdf outputs from the same latex file, afaik there no
exist an efficient pdffrag or something like that.
Why do you need that ? You can use ps2pdf.
In the past I experienced a lot of problems becaus
Matej Cepl wrote:
Oscar López wrote:
I meant that in order to produce a more automatic solution. The
problem is I produce metapost files from several applications,
mainly xfig, gnuplot, and metagraf. Most of the times it is not
Why do you go through MetaPost then? Both xfig and gnuplot can
Matej Cepl wrote:
3 Several messages complaingin of dvips are:
This is dvips(k) 5.86e Copyright 2001 Radical Eye Software
(www.radicaleye.com) ' TeX output 2003.01.21:1843' -> foo.ps
dvips: Font cmr10 used in file /home/oscar/tmp/mp/fnflm_p.0 is
not in the mapping file. dvips: Font cmmi10 used i
Matej Cepl wrote:
Well, \lambda is OK on my computer, because I have configured
properly GhostScript (see pdf file on
http://www.volny.cz/cepls/ps-pdf/foo.pdf). Unpack the attached
tarball (of course, I assume that you are with real operating
system which supports links not M$ crap), and then set
Matej Cepl wrote:
Oscar López wrote:
This foo.# is an almost eps file. In fact if someone tries to view
this eps using gv an error is triggered. Only latex when this file
is included using \includegraphics knows how to proceed
You can make it into an adult EPS file by adding command
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Oscar" == =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Oscar L=F3pez?= writes:
Oscar> Hello lyxers I have recently upgraded to lyx-1.2.3 from lyx
Oscar> -1.1.6fix4 and I am experiencing some problems with the
Oscar> inclusion of graphic files. I am trying to include the output
Oscar> of metap
Matej Cepl wrote:
Oscar López wrote:
No information for converting from 0 to eps
Does adding 0 to Edit/Preferences/Converters/File Format/EPS
help?
I added the format 0 as other file format and it doesn't help. Moreover
it does not make sense to add 0 as new format because pseud
Hello lyxers
I have recently upgraded to lyx-1.2.3 from lyx -1.1.6fix4 and I am
experiencing some problems with the inclusion of graphic files. I am
trying to include the output of metapost files, let's say fnflm.0 and
when I try to view the postscript lyx says that:
No information for convert
Dipl.-Ing. Peßenhofer Werner wrote:
When I use View->pdftex (tex2pdf) (I changed the convert command in the
preferences), then I get only the original data of the master document
without the included contents.
It seems a tex2pdf problem, did you try to export the master document
from lyx to l
Just a small poll [As background: the Qt frontend is the single big item on
the 1.3 list that's not done and won't be finished within the next few
weeks.]
What would _you_ prefer if you had the choice:
(a) have 1.3.0 now as-is with its barely functional Qt frontend,
start with the 1.4 cycle
13 matches
Mail list logo
