Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Andreas Buening wrote:
> >
> > Nicolas Ferre wrote:
[snip]
> > > I compiled xforms on aix5.1 without problem.
> >
> > How? I had to use about dozens of make flags to get it working.
> >
>
> Ooops, maybe you
Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Andreas Buening wrote:
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > I've just been trying lyx 1.3. It had lots of problems.
> >
> > 1. It's not possible to compile xforms 1.0 out of the box for Solaris
> >and AIX systems. Could you ki
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 01:59:36PM +0100, Andreas Buening wrote:
> > 5. In math mode code like "x \ne 0" is transformed to "x\ne0" for LaTeX
> >output which makes lyx basically unusable for me.
>
> Why?
>
> $x\ne0$ is LaTeX-wise equivalent
Hello!
I've just been trying lyx 1.3. It had lots of problems.
1. It's not possible to compile xforms 1.0 out of the box for Solaris
and AIX systems. Could you kindly provide some precompiled binaries?
2. The compilation on AIX terminates with:
g++ -O2 -Wno-non-template-friend -ftemplate-dep
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 08:32:43PM +0100, Andreas Buening wrote:
> > I've just seen that lyx 1.3 now "supports" the split environment which is
> > rather crucial for long equations. Is there any way to turn any existing
> > equation into a "splitted&quo
Hello!
I've just seen that lyx 1.3 now "supports" the split environment which is
rather crucial for long equations. Is there any way to turn any existing
equation into a "splitted" equation without starting from scratch, i.e.
writing \begin{split}a&b\\c&d\end{split}, selecting the text and Ctrl-m
