Am 19.06.23 um 22:16 schrieb Rich Shepard:
###
fmtutil: Error! Not all formats have been built successfully.
Visit the log files in directory
/usr/share/texmf-var/web2c
for details.
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023, Herbert Voss wrote:
Herbert,
I'm the only user of this host.
fmtutil-sys --all
$ fmtutil-sys --all
fmtutil: fmtutil is using the following fmtutil.cnf files (in precedence order):
fmtutil: /usr/local/texlive/2023/texmf-dist/web2c/fmtutil.cnf
fmtutil: fmtutil is using th
On 19 Jun 2023, at 18:46, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>
> On 6/19/23 09:36, R. H. van der Gaag wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for checking. Insert date gives the correct (Dutch) time here, too.
>> But the time stamps added to the LaTeX preview are always exactly two hours
>> behind. A riddle.
>
> Two h
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
I think the stuff about UTF-8 right above the error message has nothing to
do with the error. The error just got discovered after that log line.
Paul,
Makes sense to me.
Taking the error message at face value, it looks like you somehow ended up
with
Am 19.06.23 um 19:52 schrieb Rich Shepard:
The problem seems to be a biblatex/utf8 issue. The whole error log is
attached and the error starts at line 500.
Please teach me how to fix this and avoid future occurrences.
it is a problem with your different latex (expl3) files, they don't match
On 6/19/23 13:52, Rich Shepard wrote:
The problem seems to be a biblatex/utf8 issue. The whole error log is
attached and the error starts at line 500.
Please teach me how to fix this and avoid future occurrences.
TIA,
Rich
I think the stuff about UTF-8 right above the error message has nothin
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023, Rich Shepard wrote:
The problem seems to be a biblatex/utf8 issue. The whole error log is
attached and the error starts at line 500.
Er, not so. This just popped up again in a different doc without a
bibliography. But, a second ctrl-h to copy the whole error log produced t
The problem seems to be a biblatex/utf8 issue. The whole error log is
attached and the error starts at line 500.
Please teach me how to fix this and avoid future occurrences.
TIA,
RichThis is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.25 (TeX Live 2023) (preloaded
format=pdflatex 2023.5.23) 19 JUN
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023, Rich Shepard wrote:
Fixed! I found the solution on a StackOverflow thread from 4yrs/10mos ago:
Ctrl+trackball scroll wheel. Boy howdy! That's something I've not before
encountered in 30+ years using a trackball as the pointy device.
I must have inadvertently been pressing th
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023, Rich Shepard wrote:
In Documents -> Settings -> Display -> Preferences the font settings
haven't changed; the point size is still 12.
Also, reinstalling lyx-2.3.6.1 and yesterday's version of the document makes
no difference. All documents display on screen in the smallest
Am 19.06.23 um 19:00 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
Am 19.06.23 um 17:11 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
Am 19.06.23 um 16:55 schrieb Tobias Hilbricht:
Am Montag, dem 19.06.2023 um 15:57 +0200 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
Am 19.06.23 um 15:29 schrieb Herbert Voss:
Am 19.06.23 um 15:11 schr
On 6/19/23 09:36, R. H. van der Gaag wrote:
Thanks for checking. Insert date gives the correct (Dutch) time here, too. But
the time stamps added to the LaTeX preview are always exactly two hours behind.
A riddle.
Two hours behind sounds like UCT (GMT). European time is one hour ahead
but th
Le 19/06/2023 à 17:42, Rich Shepard a écrit :
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023, Rich Shepard wrote:
I don't know what I did on the keyboard, but suddenly all my documents
display in about a 2pt font when I open them in LyX.
In Documents -> Settings -> Display -> Preferences the font settings
haven't
cha
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023, Rich Shepard wrote:
I don't know what I did on the keyboard, but suddenly all my documents
display in about a 2pt font when I open them in LyX.
In Documents -> Settings -> Display -> Preferences the font settings haven't
changed; the point size is still 12.
Rich
--
lyx-us
I don't know what I did on the keyboard, but suddenly all my documents
display in about a 2pt font when I open them in LyX.
How might I have unintentionally done this, and how do I fix it so I can
actually see what I'm writing?
TIA,
Rich
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://
Am 19.06.23 um 16:55 schrieb Tobias Hilbricht:
Am Montag, dem 19.06.2023 um 15:57 +0200 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
Am 19.06.23 um 15:29 schrieb Herbert Voss:
Am 19.06.23 um 15:11 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
do you have a file texlive.sh in /etc/profile.d/. ?
If yes, what's its contents
Am Montag, dem 19.06.2023 um 15:57 +0200 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
>
>
> Am 19.06.23 um 15:29 schrieb Herbert Voss:
> >
> >
> > Am 19.06.23 um 15:11 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> > > > do you have a file texlive.sh in /etc/profile.d/. ?
> > > > If yes, what's its contents.
> > >
> > > export
Wolfgang Engelmann schrieb:
>
>
> Am 19.06.23 um 15:29 schrieb Herbert Voss:
>>
>>
>> Am 19.06.23 um 15:11 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
do you have a file texlive.sh in /etc/profile.d/. ?
If yes, what's its contents.
>>>
>>> export PATH=/usr/local/texlive/2022/bin/x86_64-linux:$PATH
>>> e
Am 19.06.23 um 15:29 schrieb Herbert Voss:
Am 19.06.23 um 15:11 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
do you have a file texlive.sh in /etc/profile.d/. ?
If yes, what's its contents.
export PATH=/usr/local/texlive/2022/bin/x86_64-linux:$PATH
export MANPATH=/usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf/doc/man:$MAN
> On 18 Jun 2023, at 20:24, wrote:
>
>> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
>> Van: lyx-users Namens R. H. van der Gaag
>> Verzonden: zondag 18 juni 2023 15:10
> ...
>> On 18 Jun 2023, at 15:01, Maria Gouskova wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 7:22 AM R. H. van der Gaag
>> wrote:
>>> Hi al
Am 19.06.23 um 15:11 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
do you have a file texlive.sh in /etc/profile.d/. ?
If yes, what's its contents.
export PATH=/usr/local/texlive/2022/bin/x86_64-linux:$PATH
export MANPATH=/usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf/doc/man:$MANPATH
export INFOPATH=/usr/local/texlive/2022/t
Am 19.06.23 um 14:26 schrieb Herbert Voss:
Am 19.06.23 um 11:14 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
I checked with synaptic in my Debian 5.10179-1 (2023-05-12)
> 2020_20210202-3
and with
latex -v
> Tex Live 2022
and in /usr/local
is /texlive/2022 and /texlive/2023
I have done in my ./profile acc
Am Montag, dem 19.06.2023 um 11:14 +0200 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> I checked with synaptic in my Debian 5.10179-1 (2023-05-12)
> > 2020_20210202-3
>
> and with
> latex -v
> > Tex Live 2022
>
> and in /usr/local
> is /texlive/2022 and /texlive/2023
>
> I have done in my ./profile according
Am 19.06.23 um 11:14 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
I checked with synaptic in my Debian 5.10179-1 (2023-05-12)
> 2020_20210202-3
and with
latex -v
> Tex Live 2022
and in /usr/local
is /texlive/2022 and /texlive/2023
I have done in my ./profile according to (1-) the (2-)
do you have a file
I checked with synaptic in my Debian 5.10179-1 (2023-05-12)
> 2020_20210202-3
and with
latex -v
> Tex Live 2022
and in /usr/local
is /texlive/2022 and /texlive/2023
I have done in my ./profile according to (1-) the (2-)
1-
Post-install: setting PATH
After the installation finishes, you must
25 matches
Mail list logo
