Le 23/09/2016 à 18:12, Ben Lowe a écrit :
Dear JMark,
Oh, sorry about that. I've rerun it with gcc 4.4 (and attached). Alas
I get errors in making with "/usr/include/QtCore/qthreadstorage.h:",
so I assume its an issue with my Qt version.
Now I am running out of ideas. So I asked google and...
Dear JMark,
Oh, sorry about that. I've rerun it with gcc 4.4 (and attached). Alas
I get errors in making with "/usr/include/QtCore/qthreadstorage.h:",
so I assume its an issue with my Qt version.
Kind Regards,
Ben
On 23 September 2016 at 16:09, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 23/09/2016 à 16:2
Le 23/09/2016 à 16:28, Ben Lowe a écrit :
I tried compiling with the patch, gcc 4.4 and did this twice, one with
and once without "--disable-cxx11", and attached the relevant logs.
Sadly I did not have any luck. I think updating Qt might be
non-trivial on my build of RHEL6.
In what you sent, yo
On 23 September 2016 at 13:21, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 23/09/2016 à 14:00, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
>>
>> What happens if you configure gcc 4.9 without using --disable-cxx11? It
>> should not be necessary with a recent compiler like this one.
>>
>> Concerning the error itself, what
On 23.09.2016 16:41, racoon wrote:
On 23.09.2016 13:52, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 22/09/2016 à 13:34, racoon a écrit :
On 22.09.2016 14:29, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
You should also list it here:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Layouts/Modules#toc2
It is not a module. So should I list the "hack" just
On 23.09.2016 13:52, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 22/09/2016 à 13:34, racoon a écrit :
On 22.09.2016 14:29, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
You should also list it here:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Layouts/Modules#toc2
It is not a module. So should I list the "hack" just as a comment there?
Note that my
Le 23/09/2016 à 14:00, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
What happens if you configure gcc 4.9 without using --disable-cxx11? It
should not be necessary with a recent compiler like this one.
Concerning the error itself, what is the Qt version that you use?
I see now that it is Qt 4.6. I would not
Le 23/09/2016 à 13:07, Ben Lowe a écrit :
Thank you very much for this suggestion. I have tried configuring with
this flag and then 'make'. I have attached the tail of the make output
("make_tail.log"), which unfortunately fails.
Concerning this one, try the attached patch. It is already in mas
Le 22/09/2016 à 13:34, racoon a écrit :
On 22.09.2016 14:29, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
You should also list it here:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Layouts/Modules#toc2
It is not a module. So should I list the "hack" just as a comment there?
Note that my concern regarding the MultiPar change was onl
Am Donnerstag, den 22.09.2016, 14:34 +0300 schrieb racoon:
> It is not a module.
Why don't you make it a module? This will make usage much easier.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 09/22/2016 08:22 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 22.09.2016, 05:08 +0200 schrieb Michael Berger:
Dear Jürgen,
talking to an expert always rewards - in one way or another.
In the course of making the mini file 'less complex' I removed all
loaded modules except 'Linguistics'.
11 matches
Mail list logo