On 11/28/2012 04:12 PM, Allen Wilkinson wrote:
Richard,
That helped, thanks.
I went back and tested my troubled file. I commented out the nagauth
\runningheads line (as a tracked change) and all changes were
displayed in the PDF.
Must be \runningheads definition tramples on something that t
Richard,
That helped, thanks.
I went back and tested my troubled file. I commented out the nagauth
\runningheads line (as a tracked change) and all changes were
displayed in the PDF.
Must be \runningheads definition tramples on something that track
changes needs.
If you care to debug this
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann <
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012, 14:20:00 schrieb stefano franchi:
> E.g. with my
> \usepackage[backend=biber, style=authoryear,natbib=true]{biblatex}
> I get e.g.
> Jang, Sung-Wuk et al. (2010). “N-acetylse
Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012, 14:20:00 schrieb stefano franchi:
> The biblatex manual should be installed on your system by your Tex
> distribution. The command
>
> >texdoc biblatex
>
> should bring it up.
Thanks, Stefano
Its a long documentation and not easy for the novice to find what one
Richard,
Attached is the file I used for testing that shows failure as attached.
If I deleted the text in the Introduction section, then tracked changes
view okay in the PDF.
At the end of the file I have 3 test lines to see if additional changes
still displayed when the Introduction was del
On 11/27/2012 03:01 PM, Allen Wilkinson wrote:
My problem is that if I want to show tracked changes in PDF view or
output I get these errors:
Package xcolor Error: Undefined color `LYXDELETED'.
Package xcolor Error: Undefined color `LYXADDED'.
...
+++
The biblatex manual should be installed on your system by your Tex
distribution. The command
>texdoc biblatex
should bring it up. TexLive installs it in
/usr/local/texlive/2012/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex/biblatex.pdf
If you use Debian's TEx, however, it may be in a different place---Debian's
T
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> I don't think change tracking works here, since the file is modified
> *externally* (the built-in feel, although pleasing, is pure illusion). My
>
I see. What about using the CLI: Can LyX compare two documents from
the command line, and the
On 28/11/2012 7:59 p.m., Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
I've used the same trick (exporting to an alternatively named LyX format,
but retaining the lyx file extension) for a number of other tasks (e.g.
sorting lists, expanding abbreviations)
Quick
