OK great. I don't know how to solve your problem, but hopefully someone
will come along who can. It seems that you should try to improve your
question asking skills (yes, they are skills and require effort and
practice). You were given some great advice by Steve Litt:
http://www.mail-archive.com/ly
So the numbering is correct in LyX and incorrect in the pdf? Could you
please send your .lyx file or just a minimum working example (ie a small
file that shows the problem)? Please send it to the list and not just me. I
don't know much about LyX -- I'm just trying to help you ask for help in
the be
Does it only show it wrong in LyX? Or does it also show wrong in the pdf
output?
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Kenedy Torcatt wrote:
> Hello LyX Users...
>
> I need to show in my thesis figures and equations by sections, but LyX
> is showing them wrong. I mean I activate the module
> using:
Hello LyX Users...
I need to show in my thesis figures and equations by sections, but LyX
is showing them wrong. I mean I activate the module
using: Document→Settings→Modules and add the module "Number equations
by section" and the same for figures, but when
I change a section the figures is not s
On 11/26/2011 07:51 PM, Màxim Carlavilla Márquez wrote:
> Hi, I'm a new user of LyX. I use Windows XP and LyX version 2.0.0.
>
> When trying to use \underset or \overset (for instance,
> \underset{\lim}{t} both with the command in latex and using the button
> in the frame decorations menu), I get t
Hi, I'm a new user of LyX. I use Windows XP and LyX version 2.0.0.
When trying to use \underset or \overset (for instance, \underset{\lim}{t}
both with the command in latex and using the button in the frame
decorations menu), I get the following error message:
$\underset
{t}{\lim}$
The control
On 11/26/2011 05:40 PM, David L. Johnson wrote:
On 11/26/2011 05:22 PM, Charles Reichert wrote:
Hello All,
Come across a problem...When I use display style under Edit > Math >
Change Limit Types > Display Style, I can get my lower limit to be
directly underneath my summation sign...no problem.
On 11/26/2011 05:22 PM, Charles Reichert wrote:
Hello All,
Come across a problem...When I use display style under Edit > Math >
Change Limit Types > Display Style, I can get my lower limit to be
directly underneath my summation sign...no problem. How can I get two
lower limits directly undern
Hello All,
Come across a problem...When I use display style under Edit > Math > Change
Limit Types > Display Style, I can get my lower limit to be directly
underneath my summation sign...no problem. How can I get two lower limits
directly underneath the summation sign, and the same size? Is that
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
>> > Is there some way of boxing mathematical formulas with a red box? I
>> > have tried with \fbox, but getting only black boxes.
>>
>> Any clue?
>
> Preamble:
> \usepackage{xcolor}
>
> Text:
> ERT: \fcolorbox{black}{red}{
> math inset
> ERT:
Die Gesellschaft wrote:
> ich gebe einen Sammelband heraus, das Manuskript ist so gut wie fertig
> in KOMA book gesetzt. Ich arbeite mit LYX 2.0.1. Lyx zeigt mir die
> Fußnoten ausschließlich durchgehend an, was bei einem Sammelband mit
> mehreren autoren natürlich keinen Sinn macht. Ich habe me
Am Freitag, 25. November 2011, 18:52:00 schrieb Die Gesellschaft:
> Hallo allerseits,
> ich gebe einen Sammelband heraus, das Manuskript ist so gut wie fertig
> in KOMA book gesetzt. Ich arbeite mit LYX 2.0.1. Lyx zeigt mir die
> Fußnoten ausschließlich durchgehend an, was bei einem Sammelband mit
12 matches
Mail list logo
