Le 18/10/2024 à 15:14, José Matos a écrit :
On Fri, 2024-10-18 at 14:01 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
So we have to fix our limit. Is that 2015 (gcc 5, Qt 5.5, python 3.4)
or 2019 (gcc 9, Qt 5.1x, python 3.8)?
JMarc
Note that the minimal python version in LyX 2.4 is already 3.5 (we
reall
Le 18/10/2024 à 14:25, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Hi there,
There is compilation error when compiling stable branch on ubuntu 15.10:
at GuiLog::goTo, the code uses
Sorry, this is actually GuiLog::contains
QTextCursor QTextDocument::find(const QRegularExpression &expr, const
QTextCurso
Le 18/10/2024 à 15:46, José Matos a écrit :
On Fri, 2024-10-18 at 15:28 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I bet you do! But it was such a careful decision with Pavel to see
whether we should go from gcc 4.9 to gcc 5 that it does not feels
completely right.
JMarc
The R programming language al
On Fri, 2024-10-18 at 14:01 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> So we have to fix our limit. Is that 2015 (gcc 5, Qt 5.5, python 3.4)
> or 2019 (gcc 9, Qt 5.1x, python 3.8)?
>
> JMarc
Note that the minimal python version in LyX 2.4 is already 3.5 (we
really need that in order to ensure compatibi
Hi there,
There is compilation error when compiling stable branch on ubuntu 15.10:
at GuiLog::goTo, the code uses
QTextCursor QTextDocument::find(const QRegularExpression &expr, const
QTextCursor &cursor, QTextDocument::FindFlags options = FindFlags()) const
This has been introduced in Qt 5
Le 04/10/2024 à 11:52, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 12:28:08AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 03/10/2024 ?? 23:33, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
But I don't like it there as all trivstring stuff should imho go into
trivstring.h.
Before I was afraid what will break, but as I bro
Dear devs,
Just for info, I got this when I compiled 2.3.4~devel :
mv : voulez-vous remplacer 'stamp-po' en outrepassant le mode 0644 (rw-r--r--) ?
mv: do you want to overwrite 'stamp-po' ignoring 0644 mode?
I accepted, seems harmless.
--
Jean-Pierre
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.l
On Fri, 2024-10-18 at 15:28 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I bet you do! But it was such a careful decision with Pavel to see
> whether we should go from gcc 4.9 to gcc 5 that it does not feels
> completely right.
>
> JMarc
The R programming language already requires C++17 since 2023.
I
