Re: Indentation and (un)commenting in local layout and preamble

2022-08-14 Thread Daniel
On 2022-08-10 04:15, Daniel wrote: It would be nice if LyX's source editors (for Local Layout and LaTeX Preamble) would have proper indentation and (un)commenting support. I know that the external editing is supported now, but I consider this more of a pro feature since it presupposes already

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Improved synctex support

2022-08-14 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 13.08.2022 um 17:34 schrieb Pavel Sanda : > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 02:41:30AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: >>> 2) >>> The LFUN_FORWARD_SEARCH implementation relies on the correct check in >>> getStatus. The patch adds the explicit check for presence of current >>> buffer and active output

Failed about 150 export tests

2022-08-14 Thread Kornel Benko
Maybe because of update of package 'ucs' in TL22 today. $ tlmgr info ucs package: ucs category:Package shortdesc: Extended UTF-8 input encoding support for LaTeX longdesc:The bundle provides the ucs package, and utf8x.def, together with a large number of support files. The utf8x.

Re: Indentation and (un)commenting in local layout and preamble

2022-08-14 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sun, 14 Aug 2022 09:27:40 +0200 schrieb Daniel : > On 2022-08-10 04:15, Daniel wrote: > > It would be nice if LyX's source editors (for Local Layout and LaTeX > > Preamble) would have proper indentation and (un)commenting support. > > > > I know that the external editing is supported now, but

Re: Indentation and (un)commenting in local layout and preamble

2022-08-14 Thread Daniel
On 2022-08-14 18:38, Kornel Benko wrote: Applies cleanly and compiles. Rudimentary test looks good. (At least writing local format feels better than what we have now). Kornel Thanks for testing. I realized that I changed the tab stop size before setting the font which could lead to a

Re: lyx 2.4.0 dev -download

2022-08-14 Thread José Matos
On Wed, 2022-08-03 at 20:35 +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > wait weren't you release manager for 1.5/6 ??? :) 1.6 But in between I found some more about the fine details of packaging. :-) One small issue, for example, a possible move to use autoreconf (in the case of autotools build): https://wiki.

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Improved synctex support

2022-08-14 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sun, Aug 14, 2022 at 11:43:51AM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote: > > Am 13.08.2022 um 17:34 schrieb Pavel Sanda : > > > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 02:41:30AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > >>> 2) > >>> The LFUN_FORWARD_SEARCH implementation relies on the correct check in > >>> getStatus. The patch