Re: beta2?

2016-02-13 Thread Georg Baum
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I agree that it would be nice to remove unnecessary files. As far as > figuring out which files are unnecessary, I volunteer to take any > experimental patch, build a tar ball, and send it to Uwe to see if he > has time to build the test tar ball so we can see if he gets a

Re: beta2?

2016-02-13 Thread Peter Kümmel
Am 13.02.2016 um 10:57 schrieb Georg Baum: Scott Kostyshak wrote: I agree that it would be nice to remove unnecessary files. As far as figuring out which files are unnecessary, I volunteer to take any experimental patch, build a tar ball, and send it to Uwe to see if he has time to build the te

Re: Printer missing in 2.2.0beta1

2016-02-13 Thread Richard Heck
On 02/12/2016 03:46 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 12/02/2016 09:38, Stephan Witt a écrit : >> But this doesn’t solve the problem how to print individual chapters. > > What do you mean? > > BTW Richard, what happened with the idea of reusing the Ctrl+P binding > for some printing-like activit

Re: beta2?

2016-02-13 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 12:34:26PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: > Am 13.02.2016 um 10:57 schrieb Georg Baum: > >Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > >>I agree that it would be nice to remove unnecessary files. As far as > >>figuring out which files are unnecessary, I volunteer to take any > >>experimental pa

Re: Printer missing in 2.2.0beta1

2016-02-13 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 09:53:58AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > On 02/12/2016 03:46 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Le 12/02/2016 09:38, Stephan Witt a écrit : > >> But this doesn’t solve the problem how to print individual chapters. > > > > What do you mean? > > > > BTW Richard, what happened

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

2016-02-13 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:53:34PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:40:56PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > > On 01/21/2016 04:07 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > >> So is it a problem that compiling in C++11 mode is broken with gcc 4.6? > > >> I

Re: Printer missing in 2.2.0beta1

2016-02-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Yes, and we could use the "print preview" icon for it. JMarc Le 13 février 2016 18:06:15 GMT+01:00, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >Was the idea to bind it to preview? So would we bind it to the same >function as ctrl+R currently? > >Scott

Re: Printer missing in 2.2.0beta1

2016-02-13 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 12.02.2016 um 09:38 schrieb Stephan Witt: But this doesn’t solve the problem how to print individual chapters. I don't understand the discussion. You can export to a format you like then use the printer dialog of your preferred viewer to print what you like. If you only like to print one

Re: Printer missing in 2.2.0beta1

2016-02-13 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 12.02.2016 um 09:38 schrieb Stephan Witt: > >> But this doesn’t solve the problem how to print individual chapters. > > > I don't understand the discussion. You can export to a format you like then > use the printer dialog of your preferred vi

Re: beta2?

2016-02-13 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 12:34:26PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: >> Am 13.02.2016 um 10:57 schrieb Georg Baum: >> >Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> > >> >>I agree that it would be nice to remove unnecessary files. As far as >> >>figuring out which fi

Re: beta2?

2016-02-13 Thread Peter Kümmel
Am 13.02.2016 um 18:01 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 12:34:26PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: Am 13.02.2016 um 10:57 schrieb Georg Baum: Scott Kostyshak wrote: I agree that it would be nice to remove unnecessary files. As far as figuring out which files are unnecessary, I vo

Re: beta2?

2016-02-13 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 13.02.2016 um 18:01 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Thanks for testing, Peter. I'll wait for a fix, and then I suppose we move to beta3? Sorry, but why do we act like beginners? I wrote what is missing in the tarball. So why not add these files, send me the tarball by private mail to check and t

Re: Printer missing in 2.2.0beta1

2016-02-13 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 13.02.2016 um 18:42 schrieb Liviu Andronic: One thing you cannot do from an exported PS or PDF file is print e.g. LyX Notes. Well, LyX notes are supposed to be in LyX only. If you want to have them in the output, turn them into greyed-out notes (and adjust the font color if you don't like

Re: beta2?

2016-02-13 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 07:11:48PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 13.02.2016 um 18:01 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > >Thanks for testing, Peter. I'll wait for a fix, and then I suppose we > >move to beta3? > > Sorry, but why do we act like beginners? > > I wrote what is missing in the tarball. So wh

Re: beta2?

2016-02-13 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 01:24:20PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 07:11:48PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > Am 13.02.2016 um 18:01 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > > >Thanks for testing, Peter. I'll wait for a fix, and then I suppose we > > >move to beta3? > > > > Sorry, but w

Re: [LyX/master] Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts problems".

2016-02-13 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 07:16:44PM +0200, Günter Milde wrote: > commit 1523fc6023440f10ca0d82a681ded5c060d8fd33 > Author: Günter Milde > Date: Tue Oct 20 19:14:39 2015 +0200 > > Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts problems". > > Fixes output for 3 of the 4 test lyx-f

Re: 2.2.0 beta 1: Xetex not working

2016-02-13 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2016-02-11, Jürgen Lange wrote: > The PDF Producer changed from Xetex 0.2 in 2.1.4. to MikTex-xdvipdfmx > (20150315) in 2.2.0beta1. This is rather due to an MikTex update. xdvipdfmx is the part of XeTeX that transforms the intermediate format (XDVI) to PDF. Günter

Re: [LyX/master] Make ja/splash.lyx compilable again.

2016-02-13 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2016-02-09, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 08.02.2016 um 22:38 schrieb Kornel Benko: >> I am not sure why do you think I had changed anything in the Japanese text. >> Sure, I cannot understand the written text, but I felt able to compare the >> pdf-output with the >> appearance of text in lyx window.

Re: [LyX/master] Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts problems".

2016-02-13 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2016-02-13, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 07:16:44PM +0200, Günter Milde wrote: >> commit 1523fc6023440f10ca0d82a681ded5c060d8fd33 >> Author: Günter Milde >> Date: Tue Oct 20 19:14:39 2015 +0200 >> Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts problems". >> F

Re: [LyX/master] Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts problems".

2016-02-13 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 08:54:57PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-02-13, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 07:16:44PM +0200, Günter Milde wrote: > >> commit 1523fc6023440f10ca0d82a681ded5c060d8fd33 > >> Author: Günter Milde > >> Date: Tue Oct 20 19:14:39 2015 +0200 > > >

Re: Printer missing in 2.2.0beta1

2016-02-13 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 13.02.2016 um 18:38 schrieb Uwe Stöhr : > > Am 12.02.2016 um 09:38 schrieb Stephan Witt: > >> But this doesn’t solve the problem how to print individual chapters. > > I don't understand the discussion. You can export to a format you like then > use the printer dialog of your preferred viewer

Re: [LyX/master] Make ja/splash.lyx compilable again.

2016-02-13 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Samstag, 13. Februar 2016 um 20:46:13, schrieb Guenter Milde > On 2016-02-09, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > Am 08.02.2016 um 22:38 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > >> I am not sure why do you think I had changed anything in the Japanese text. > >> Sure, I cannot understand the written text, but I felt able t