Re: r38765 - in lyx-devel/trunk: . development/cmake src src/client src/tex2lyx

2011-05-17 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 15.05.2011 um 15:21 schrieb kuem...@lyx.org: > Author: kuemmel > Date: Sun May 15 15:21:18 2011 > New Revision: 38765 > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38765 > > Log: > cmake: build a .dmg file on Mac, looks not as nice as the official installer > but it runs Peter, what is the requi

Re: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-17 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:54 PM, venom00 wrote: > Vincent or someone else, can you tell me if it's OK to include a pair of > files > directly from the Qt Creator code? > Just a quick reply so I can go on with the patch. > Hi Venom, Sorry for not responding earlier. It feels like it's a bit to

Re: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

2011-05-17 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
> > > 3. I cannot disable the CMake component "DOC". It is annoying that the > compiler always stumbles over this component. I can of course delete it from > the solution file, but I fear that this will break something > When I compile LyX's trunk, CMake doesn't have this DOC component. > Deleting

Re: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

2011-05-17 Thread Kornel
Am Dienstag, 17. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel: > On 17.05.2011 01:17, Uwe Stöhr wrote: ... > > 3. I cannot disable the CMake component "DOC". It is annoying that the > > compiler always stumbles over this component. I can of course delete it > > from the solution file, but I fear that this will br

Re: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

2011-05-17 Thread Kornel
Am Dienstag, 17. Mai 2011 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > 3. I cannot disable the CMake component "DOC". It is annoying that the > > compiler always stumbles over this component. I can of course delete it > > from the solution file, but I fear that this will break something > > When I compile L

Re: [HELP] Windows 7, 64 bit Bug

2011-05-17 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Joost Verburg wrote: > "Vincent van Ravesteijn" wrote in message > news:4dd16a18.1080...@lyx.org... > > The reason was that the installer configured LyX using the > > preferences of LyX 1.6. In particular this meant that in Tools > > ->Preferences->Path, there w

Re: r38765 - in lyx-devel/trunk: . development/cmake src src/client src/tex2lyx

2011-05-17 Thread Peter Kuemmel
> > Peter, what is the required environment for that? > I cannot get it working with Qt 4.6.2, is it too old? > I've installed 4.7.2 here but I assume it doesn't matter. Do you use cmake 2.8.4? Have you also tried the develop/cmake/dmg script, I only have tested it with the options used there.

Re: r38765 - in lyx-devel/trunk: . development/cmake src src/client src/tex2lyx

2011-05-17 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 17.05.2011 um 12:39 schrieb Peter Kuemmel: >> >> Peter, what is the required environment for that? >> I cannot get it working with Qt 4.6.2, is it too old? >> > > I've installed 4.7.2 here but I assume it doesn't matter. > > Do you use cmake 2.8.4? Yes. > Have you also tried the develop/c

Re: r38765 - in lyx-devel/trunk: . development/cmake src src/client src/tex2lyx

2011-05-17 Thread Peter Kuemmel
Original-Nachricht > Datum: Tue, 17 May 2011 14:08:23 +0200 > Von: Stephan Witt > An: LyX Devel > Betreff: Re: r38765 - in lyx-devel/trunk: . development/cmake src src/client > src/tex2lyx > Am 17.05.2011 um 12:39 schrieb Peter Kuemmel: > > >> > >> Peter, what is the requir

Re: Lyx 2.0.0 OSX crashes

2011-05-17 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 17.05.2011 um 18:05 schrieb Murat Yildizoglu: > I am lost on this. I have installed the last version of Lyx and it crashes > quite systematically. I have never seen this with Lyx. It is nearly unusable. > I have also version 1.6 on my laptop but the preferences folders are of > course separat

Re: Lyx 2.0.0 OSX crashes

2011-05-17 Thread Murat Yildizoglu
Thanks Stephan! I have indeed totally forgotten this problem that we have discussed on the users list. Yes, I am using Divvy, but I am not trying to use it on the Lyx Window. Even without this, can it crash Lyx? The bug report does not show any potential solution. Am I stuck between going back to

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-17 Thread venom00
> Hi Venom, > Sorry for not responding earlier. > It feels like it's a bit too much to include a pair of files from another project just to add a "rubber button" to your search box. > Can you point at the code that you want to use. Maybe there is a simpler solution ? > > Vincent Maybe we can reus

Re: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-17 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On 17-5-2011 20:15, venom00 wrote: >> Hi Venom, >> Sorry for not responding earlier. >> It feels like it's a bit too much to include a pair of files from another > project just to add a "rubber button" to your search box. >> Can you point at the code that you want to use. Maybe there is a simpler

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-17 Thread venom00
> But... I think there are quite some places where we can pimp LyX a > bit and maybe we can use it in more places as you say. Very well! > > Is there a reason for which the moc_ file is included at > the end? I've spent an > > hour (in cmake's lyx_automoc & friends) to understand why > the moc

Re: Lyx 2.0.0 OSX crashes

2011-05-17 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 17.05.2011 um 18:34 schrieb Murat Yildizoglu: > Thanks Stephan! > I have indeed totally forgotten this problem that we have discussed on the > users list. > > Yes, I am using Divvy, but I am not trying to use it on the Lyx Window. Even > without this, can it crash Lyx? It seems so. :( Did

Re: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-17 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On 17-5-2011 21:37, venom00 wrote: >> But... I think there are quite some places where we can pimp LyX a >> bit and maybe we can use it in more places as you say. > > Very well! > >>> Is there a reason for which the moc_ file is included at >> the end? I've spent an >>> hour (in cmake's lyx_aut

Re: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-17 Thread Peter Kümmel
Is there a reason for which the moc_ file is included at the end? I've spent an The include triggers the moc generation. I've moved fancylineedit.* into qt4 (no gui code in support, only QtCore classes), then called cmake again and it build without errors. hour (in cmake's lyx_automoc& frien

Re: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-17 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 17.05.2011 21:46, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Mmmh, now I'm starting to get confused about your question. Are you asking why you have to include the moc_* files or why the moc_* file was not created for fancylineedit ? The creation of the moc_* file is not trigged by including it. macro(

Re: Road to LyX 2.1 - #1 (2011-05-15)

2011-05-17 Thread Pavel Sanda
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > whats changes constitute new branch creation in your proposal, > > As I propose that: - the release manager will be the only one merging stuff > into trunk-stable (the same as that current the branch release manager is the > only one that determines what goes into

Re: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-17 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On 17-5-2011 22:02, Peter Kümmel wrote: > On 17.05.2011 21:46, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >> >> Mmmh, now I'm starting to get confused about your question. Are >> you asking why you have to include the moc_* files or why the >> moc_* file was not created for fancylineedit ? The creation of >> th

RE: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-17 Thread venom00
> The creation of the moc_* file is not trigged by including it. Mmmh, it seems that including it triggers its creation, take a look at the lyx_automoc macro. For how I've understood it, it checks all the file against the following regexp: #include +["<]moc_[^]+\\.cpp[">] And then runs the moc g

Re: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 08:11:29AM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote: > On 16.05.2011 23:54, venom00 wrote: > >Vincent or someone else, can you tell me if it's OK to include a pair > >of files directly from the Qt Creator code? Just a quick reply so I > >can go on with the patch. > > Isn't QtCreator LGPL

Re: Too much options in LyX

2011-05-17 Thread Kornel
Am Dienstag, 17. Mai 2011 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > On 17-5-2011 22:02, Peter Kümmel wrote: > > On 17.05.2011 21:46, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > >> Mmmh, now I'm starting to get confused about your question. Are > >> you asking why you have to include the moc_* files or why the > >> moc

Re: Road to LyX 2.1 - #1 (2011-05-15)

2011-05-17 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On 17-5-2011 22:08, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >>> whats changes constitute new branch creation in your proposal, >> >> As I propose that: - the release manager will be the only one merging stuff >> into trunk-stable (the same as that current the branch release manager is th

Re: Lyx 2.0.0 OSX crashes

2011-05-17 Thread Murat Yildizoglu
Hi Stephan, I have bad news. I have deactivated Divvy and restarted my laptop. I have checked that Divvy is not answering its keyboard shortcut and started Lyx 2. Bang! It has crashed. I have renamed the config folder and restarted, Lyx has created a new Lyx 2 config folder and ... crashed. Now I

Re: Lyx 2.0.0 OSX crashes

2011-05-17 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 17.05.2011 23:04, Murat Yildizoglu wrote: Hi Stephan, I have bad news. I have deactivated Divvy and restarted my laptop. I have checked that Divvy is not answering its keyboard shortcut and started Lyx 2. Bang! It has crashed. I have renamed the config folder and restarted, Lyx has created a

Re: Lyx 2.0.0 OSX crashes

2011-05-17 Thread Murat Yildizoglu
I think I have found the other conflict: I have recently bought Forever save 2 in a bundle and installed it. Since Lyx is my main editor, I have configured it for taking snapshots of Lyx 2 documents and I think it crashes Lyx as soon as it tries to plug itself on it. I have suppressed Lyx from the

Re: LyX 1.6.10 won't compile on gcc 4.6

2011-05-17 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 16.05.2011 20:45, Pavel Sanda wrote: hi, i got this report. CXXInsetInclude.lo insets/InsetInclude.cpp: In member function `const lyx::support::FileNameList& lyx::InsetInclude::getBibfilesCache(const lyx::Buffer&) const`: insets/InsetInclude.cpp:809:37: error: uninitialized const `e

Re: r38765 - in lyx-devel/trunk: . development/cmake src src/client src/tex2lyx

2011-05-17 Thread Peter Kümmel
-- warning: *NOT* handled - .app directory case... CMake Error at /opt/local/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/BundleUtilities.cmake:627 (message): error: fixup_bundle: not a valid bundle Call Stack (most recent call first): cmake_install.cmake:1835 (fixup_bundle) OK, I have the same here. I clean

Re: LyX 1.6.10 won't compile on gcc 4.6

2011-05-17 Thread Pavel Sanda
Peter Kümmel wrote: > On 16.05.2011 20:45, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> hi, >> i got this report. >> >> CXXInsetInclude.lo >> insets/InsetInclude.cpp: In member function `const >> lyx::support::FileNameList& >> lyx::InsetInclude::getBibfilesCache(const lyx::Buffer&) const`: >> insets/InsetInclu

Re: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

2011-05-17 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 17.05.2011 11:39, schrieb Kornel: 3. I cannot disable the CMake component "DOC". It is annoying that the compiler always stumbles over this component. I can of course delete it from the solution file, but I fear that this will break something You can, like it was already in lyx1.6. See atta

Re: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

2011-05-17 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 17.05.2011 08:09, schrieb Peter Kümmel: 1. a LyX.exe file is compiled, but at the end of the compilation process MSVC complains telling me D:\LyXSVN\LyX2.0.x\compile-result\Debug\ALL_BUILD cannot find file But thee is no such directory, there is only this one: D:\LyXSVN\LyX2.0.x\compile-re

Re: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Heck
On 05/17/2011 08:52 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 17.05.2011 11:39, schrieb Kornel: 3. I cannot disable the CMake component "DOC". It is annoying that the compiler always stumbles over this component. I can of course delete it from the solution file, but I fear that this will break something You

Re: Lyx 2.0.0 OSX crashes

2011-05-17 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 17.05.2011 um 23:21 schrieb Murat Yildizoglu: > I think I have found the other conflict: I have recently bought Forever save > 2 in a bundle and installed it. Since Lyx is my main editor, I have > configured it for taking snapshots of Lyx 2 documents and I think it crashes > Lyx as soon as i

Re: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

2011-05-17 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 18.05.2011 03:09, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 17.05.2011 08:09, schrieb Peter Kümmel: 1. a LyX.exe file is compiled, but at the end of the compilation process MSVC complains telling me D:\LyXSVN\LyX2.0.x\compile-result\Debug\ALL_BUILD cannot find file But thee is no such directory, there is only

Re: Lyx 2.0.0 OSX crashes

2011-05-17 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 18.05.2011 07:33, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 17.05.2011 um 23:21 schrieb Murat Yildizoglu: I think I have found the other conflict: I have recently bought Forever save 2 in a bundle and installed it. Since Lyx is my main editor, I have configured it for taking snapshots of Lyx 2 documents and

RE: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

2011-05-17 Thread venom00
My 2 cents without reading anything of this thread: CMake under Windows 7 32 bit with Qt Creator and VS2010 compiler works fine for me, I just noticed you have changed the location of CMakeList.txt, all the rest is fine. venom00

Re: Lyx 2.0.0 OSX crashes

2011-05-17 Thread Sebastian Rockel
Hello, I can confirm that on my OSX 10.6.7 machine LyX2 is reproducible crashing when using BetterTouchTool to resize the main window. (I think that wasn't the case with any release candidate as far as I remember, LyX 1.6 was okay as well) Kind regards, Sebastian Am 17.05.2011 um 18:27 schrieb