On Saturday 04 March 2006 07:52, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Tomasz" == Tomasz Łuczak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Tomasz> But configure command check only for a HTML previewer: mozilla
> Tomasz> and netscape, why not firefox and konqueror?
>
> Yes, we should fix this in some later vers
I posted at patch at bugzilla for 675, which implements Jean-Marc's
suggestion to \protect the graphic if inside the caption (or any other
running arg). It works as predicted.
The discussion at the bug report made me think about caption handling
again. The relevant code is in breakParagraph in te
João Luis Meloni Assirati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > We insert the sourcespecials ourselfs, and it is what is set in those
| > that latex reports.
|
| Can you explain it better, please? Latex reports errors as this:
|
| ! Undefined control sequence.
| l.24 asd asd \asd
| a
Am Samstag, 4. März 2006 09:48 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
> Does this sound like an idea (yes, it's adding more special code :-( )
Of
> course if we move to using a caption inset (on what timetable? It looks
> good!) we should do it inside there. Might even be easier still.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sw/s
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 11:51:30AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Samstag, 4. März 2006 09:48 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
>
> > Does this sound like an idea (yes, it's adding more special code :-( )
> Of
> > course if we move to using a caption inset (on what timetable? It looks
> > good!) we should d
Am Freitag, 3. März 2006 16:42 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
>
> I have put pre6 in ftp.devel.lyx.org, I'd be happy if you could test
> it for brown paper bugs.
The date in the help->about dialog is jan 30, 2003. I guess that this
should be fixed. Apart from that it seems to work fine.
Georg
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Am Freitag, 3. März 2006 16:42 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
| >
| > I have put pre6 in ftp.devel.lyx.org, I'd be happy if you could test
| > it for brown paper bugs.
|
| The date in the help->about dialog is jan 30, 2003. I guess that this
| should be fi
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Add an item to the news page about the migration and you can just point
> people to that in the future...
Attached is a first approach. Feel free to modify as you wish and commit (I
don't have write access to www-users).
The only thing I didn't touch is "How to mirror us?"
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| (I don't have write access to www-users).
Are you sure?
--
Lgb
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Are you sure?
No. I never tried it, to be honest. But if you agree with the patch, I can try
if I can commit it.
Jürgen
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Are you sure?
|
| No. I never tried it, to be honest. But if you agree with the patch, I can
try
| if I can commit it.
I think the patch is ok... perhaps except for the size needed for a
working copy. A fresh cop
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I think the patch is ok... perhaps except for the size needed for a
> working copy. A fresh copy is about 270MB, with all three frontends
> built it is about 1.1GB.
I see. I'll change that.
Jürgen
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > I think the patch is ok... perhaps except for the size needed for a
> > working copy. A fresh copy is about 270MB, with all three frontends
> > built it is about 1.1GB.
>
> I see. I'll change that.
Obviously I have write access ;-)
Please have a look at the missing
Am Freitag, 3. März 2006 00:46 schrieb João Luis Meloni Assirati:
> Sorry, guys. I hadn't reallized that Lars post was about the .h file. I
> understand now, it was a stupid error. Attached is the updated patch.
João,
I think that DVI search is a very useful feature and that it should go in
a
Am Samstag, 4. März 2006 19:50 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
> Why not use change the name of the file? Add a prefix or suffix or
> something? No playing around with the file extension.
A suffix _pre was the solution of João. That lead to the passing around of
the for_preview flag that I did not
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I created the attached patch, based on your last one (dvi-search-3.diff).
| It works for me (did only test xdvi).
| In order to give the DVI file with source specials a different name I
| defined the suffix of the new dvi2 format as dvix. This triggered a
Hello,
Here is a status for the port to Qt4.1 that I wrote last Christmas. I
hope this is right time to talk about this matter. If not, please ignore
this post.
... still here? Please read on :-)
** UI files: they have all been ported to Qt4 format.
- With Qt4, uic generates a header on
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Lars, you told me you want to have a say in how the porting to Qt4 is
> done. I just want to warn you that it is not worth having the two
> frontends sharing code at all. You must see them as two totally
> separated frontends (the same as xform or gtk). But feel free to
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 09:33:11PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I think now is a good time to retire the XForms frontend and, once your
> port is verified as working I'd also suggest retiring the Qt2/3 frontend.
Could we at least wait until /somebody/ is shipping it :)
john
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I don't think you need worry too much about code review; the frontends
| already contain dodgy code and it doesn't worry Lars too much because he's
| interested primarily in the quality of the core code.
Oh, it worries me a lot.
| (I guess he also trus
We have some of these...
I guess that since 1.4.0 is released very soon now, these bugs will
never be fixed.
IMHO the target should be changed to the earliest version where the
bug is fixed (1.4.0 for most of them I guess) and resolved as fixed.
Perhaps with a note that it will not be fixed for
On Saturday 04 March 2006 22:20, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> We have some of these...
>
> I guess that since 1.4.0 is released very soon now, these bugs will
> never be fixed.
If they are fixed in 1.4.x then they are really fixed. Or you let some of
them to me for my ultra-stable series. ;-)
22 matches
Mail list logo
