Testing Georg's patch (Re: Blue line thoughts, and a patch)

2006-02-04 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 10:19:45PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Am Freitag, 3. Februar 2006 10:34 schrieb Martin Vermeer: > > OK in principle... but could you list in detail which pieces of the > > patch you want included and which excluded? > > Here is the patch. It is IMO safe for 1.4.0, and it fi

Re: bug 2026 again

2006-02-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | OK, here is the proposal: Replace any occurence of the hard coded layout | Standard in lyx2lyx with an empty string "". This is a minimal change and | requires no changes in LyX. | Lars, would this be OK for 1.4.0 (of course after some testing)? If yes, | I

Re: help needed for LyX's configure script

2006-02-04 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Paul A. Rubin wrote: I ran your script on Win XP (after putting a file named jedit.jar in a directory on the Windows command path), and the script found the jar file. So I don't think it's anything inherent in the extension (assuming, as I suspect, that you're testing on Windows). Yes I'm t

Re: bug 2026 again

2006-02-04 Thread Georg Baum
Am Samstag, 4. Februar 2006 11:33 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: > This sounds like a hack that will actually be usefull. > Go ahead with creating the patch. Here it is (2026-4.diff). I tested it with a lot of files, and the lyx2lyx conversion works. Yesterday I only tested commandline export, so t

Re: Testing Georg's patch (Re: Blue line thoughts, and a patch)

2006-02-04 Thread Georg Baum
Am Samstag, 4. Februar 2006 09:43 schrieb Martin Vermeer: > I gave this patch some testing, and it seems to address what it claims > to address, and introduces no new bugs that I could see. Good. > I would say, check it in. Don't you want to do it (+ ChangeLog)? After all, I only picked those c

Re: bug 2026 again

2006-02-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Am Samstag, 4. Februar 2006 11:33 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: | > This sounds like a hack that will actually be usefull. | > Go ahead with creating the patch. | | Here it is (2026-4.diff). I tested it with a lot of files, and the lyx2lyx | conversion wor

Re: Testing Georg's patch (Re: Blue line thoughts, and a patch)

2006-02-04 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 04:33:35PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Am Samstag, 4. Februar 2006 09:43 schrieb Martin Vermeer: > > I gave this patch some testing, and it seems to address what it claims > > to address, and introduces no new bugs that I could see. > > Good. > > > I would say, check it in.

Re: 1.4cvs performance problem over network when adding a paragraph

2006-02-04 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 04:02:41PM +0100, Helge Hafting wrote: > There is a strange performance problem when displaying a lyx that is > running on another machine. (ADSL connection) How fast is your ADSL? And is it the same both ways (A = Asymmetric)? I have a 256/256 kb ADSL (which thus != A) an

Re: bug 2026 again

2006-02-04 Thread Georg Baum
Am Samstag, 4. Februar 2006 16:39 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: > | Jean-Marc, we could of course also combine both patches and use the > | layout that you proposed. That would be 2026-6.diff. > > I do not agree with that as the final solution > > Why require a special name? I was Jean-Marc

Re: bug 2026 again

2006-02-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>> Why require a special name? >I was Jean-Marcs idea. For me, "Standard" would also be OK (although a >special name is a bit more expressive, I propose to use \begin_layout without any name. "" is not good because it is read explicitely. The empty layout name should be intrpreted as default

Re: bug 2026 again

2006-02-04 Thread Georg Baum
Am Samstag, 4. Februar 2006 18:18 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > > I propose to use > \begin_layout > without any name. "" is not good > because it is read explicitely. Then I misunderstood, sorry. > The empty layout name should be > intrpreted as defaultLayout in getLayout, but should be save

Issues with 1.4pre4

2006-02-04 Thread Giuseppe Ragusa
I have been working with 1.4cvs and now 1.4pre4 for a while, both in Osx and linux. I really love the improvement from 1.3.x to 1.4.x. There are few bugs I would like to bring to the attention of the developers: [math-macro behavior ==> Big regression w.r.t. 1.3.x] M-x; math-macro mysum 2 \sum^

Re: Screen update improvements

2006-02-04 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 01:25:05PM -0500, Bennett Helm wrote: > On Jan 11, 2006, at 4:29 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > >>"Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >Lars> You have of course tested this on linux as well. Not just > >Lars> windows. > > > >Martin did. W

Re: Screen update improvements

2006-02-04 Thread Bennett Helm
On Feb 4, 2006, at 4:49 PM, Martin Vermeer wrote: Bennett, did you get around to testing my speedup inside insets patch (bug 2195)? Sorry -- I tried but couldn't apply the patch: there's a conflict with (if I remember correctly) rowpainter.C, and I hadn't yet had time to investigate. I'll

Re: help needed for LyX's configure script

2006-02-04 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Uwe Stöhr wrote: I used now the following code to assure that it will also work on Lunix: --- # Search something to view LaTeX-files echo $ac_n "checking for an editor to view LaTeX-files""... $ac_c" echo "$ac_t""(jEdit PSPad WinShell ConTEXT Crimson Editor Vim TeXnicCenter LaTeXEditor WinEdt

Re: Issues with 1.4pre4

2006-02-04 Thread Beck, Andrew Thomas - BECAT001
> >There are few bugs I would like to bring to the attention of the developers: > >[math-macro behavior ==> Big regression w.r.t. 1.3.x] >M-x; math-macro mysum 2 >\sum^{#1}_{#2} > >Problems: >a) the cursor is outside the box inset (flushed left) > >b) type \mysum, get the #1 and #2 fields, enter so