Hello,
here comes another update for de.po. Please apply.
German users: "de.po" is still work in progress. Expect more updates in
the next couple of days.
Michael
patch2-de-po.diff.bz2
Description: Binary data
The following patch refines a bit the bibitem de-goosing.
First, it moves the cursor after the bibitem when it has been inserted (as it
is in 1.3 and also with any other inset). Second, it disables the lfun
outside the bibliography environment. Currently, it is possible to place
bibitems in se
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 05:06:34PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> The following patch refines a bit the bibitem de-goosing.
>
> First, it moves the cursor after the bibitem when it has been inserted (as it
> is in 1.3 and also with any other inset). Second, it disables the lfun
> outside
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Actually, considering this, do you _ever_ want to insert a bibitem
> manually?
Probably not (I could inside the Bibliography layout, since LaTeX accepts
multiple bibitems in one line, but that does not make much sense).
> Note that even with this patch, you may till find
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 06:01:55PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Actually, considering this, do you _ever_ want to insert a bibitem
> > manually?
>
> Probably not (I could inside the Bibliography layout, since LaTeX accepts
> multiple bibitems in one line, but tha
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Actually that is easy to suppress, if suppressing is what we want: in
> text3.C in the LFUN_SELFINSERT switch item, test for a bibitem inset in pos
> 0 and don't insert if one is found.
But then you can still insert other items. The ideal solution would be if the
position
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> But then you can still insert other items
... other insets, of course.
Jürgen
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 07:57:53PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Actually that is easy to suppress, if suppressing is what we want: in
> > text3.C in the LFUN_SELFINSERT switch item, test for a bibitem inset in pos
> > 0 and don't insert if one is found.
>
> But th
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 10:09:57PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 07:57:53PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Something along these lines, then? (Untested)
>
> - Martin
Forget this. Try this (tested):
- Martin
Index: text.C
