Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Index: src/frontends/qt2/Makefile.am
> ===
> RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/frontends/qt2/Makefile.am,v
> retrieving revision 1.93
> diff -u -r1.93 Makefile.am
> --- src/frontends/qt2/Make
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Angus> As reported on the users' list. These patches look like
>> Angus> no-brainers to me. Ok to commit to both branches?
>>
>> Beware of no-brainers... In the 1.3.x patch I see
>> + LabelString"Acknowledgments: "
>>
>> Is this real
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> What about src/frontends/qt2/ui/moc/Makefile.am,
Georg> src/frontends/qt2/ui/Makefile.am
Georg> src/frontends/qt2/moc/Makefile.am
Georg> ?
Georg> Or did you levae them out on purpose?
Hmmm, do we care? I am not sure what this define
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> One week later... Yes, I had. Remade patches attached. Ok to
Angus> apply?
Yes.
JMarc
Reuben Thomas wrote:
> "you have to resolve to magic codes"
> resolve --> resort
Thanks Reuben. I applied the fix to the version in the 1.4.x tree.
--
Angus
The current autogenerated lyx.spec for rpms suffers from an annoying
bug: The dependency for Qt is hardcoded to 'qt >= 2.3.0'. However, the
package is named 'qt' only on redhat/fedora. On SUSE it is 'qt3' and
on mandrake it is 'libqt3'. This proves to be an annoyance for our
user-contributed rpms
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Reuben Thomas wrote:
>> "you have to resolve to magic codes" resolve --> resort
Angus> Thanks Reuben. I applied the fix to the version in the 1.4.x
Angus> tree.
Could you apply it to 1.3.5cvs too?
JMarc
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Marc> I updated the patch to use a USE_NATIVE_FILEDIALOG define
Jean-Marc> and fix a few bugs. Since this is more modular, I propose
Jean-Marc> to apply it later today.
I applied a slightly modified version.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> Reuben Thomas wrote:
>>> "you have to resolve to magic codes" resolve --> resort
>
> Angus> Thanks Reuben. I applied the fix to the version in the 1.4.x
> Angus> tree.
>
> Could you apply it to 1.3.5cvs too?
I don't think that I have write privileges to the d
Here is an updated version of the patch this purports to fix menu
merging with Qt/Mac. Unlike previous incarnations, this one has a
chance to work properly.
I'd appreciate to see it get some testing (Bennett, Nirmal, for when
you come back from vacation...).
JMarc
Index: src/frontends/qt2/Chang
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> I don't think that I have write privileges to the doc tree.
Angus> Also I don't have said tree checked out. So, no ;-)
Tsk, tsk. I grudgingly did it.
JMarc
I've just received this response from a user trying to extract the rpm
for RH9. Is the rpm corrupt?
As an aside, why don't we also post .md5sum files containing the
output of md5sum so that users can verify that they have downloaded
the file correctly?
Angus
On Monday 09 August 2004 3:45 pm,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> The current autogenerated lyx.spec for rpms suffers from an annoying
> bug: The dependency for Qt is hardcoded to 'qt >= 2.3.0'. However, the
> package is named 'qt' only on redhat/fedora. On SUSE it is 'qt3' and
> on mandrake it is 'libqt3'. This proves to be an anno
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I've just received this response from a user trying to extract the rpm
| for RH9. Is the rpm corrupt?
>
| As an aside, why don't we also post .md5sum files containing the
| output of md5sum so that users can verify that they have downloaded
| the file
> The current autogenerated lyx.spec for rpms suffers from an annoying
> bug: The dependency for Qt is hardcoded to 'qt >= 2.3.0'. However, the
> package is named 'qt' only on redhat/fedora. On SUSE it is 'qt3' and
> on mandrake it is 'libqt3'. This proves to be an annoyance for our
> user-contribu
On poniedziaÅek 09 sierpieÅ 2004 09:54 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I've just received this response from a user trying to extract the rpm
> for RH9. Is the rpm corrupt?
Doesn't seem so.
> As an aside, why don't we also post .md5sum files containing the
Because rpm does the hash checking already.
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> The current autogenerated lyx.spec for rpms suffers from an
>> annoying bug: The dependency for Qt is hardcoded to 'qt >= 2.3.0'.
>> However, the package is named 'qt' only on redhat/fedora. On SUSE
>> it
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Georg" == Georg Baum
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>
> Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> The current autogenerated lyx.spec for rpms suffers from an
>>> annoying bug: The dependency for Qt is hardcoded to 'qt >= 2.3.0'.
>>> However, the package
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> We could do the same and ask which package provides `which latex`.
Indeed.
> Georg> Why is the manual dependency of qt needed at all? IIRC rpm
> Georg> handles library dependencies automatically, so we don't need to
> Georg> specify qt and xforms at all, because rpm
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>> We could do the same and ask which package provides `which latex`.
>
> Clever! It even works. In fact, could the script below be modified so that
> all continues to work if latex is found but is also found to not be a part
> of an rpm?
The
Georg Baum wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>
>>> We could do the same and ask which package provides `which latex`.
>>
>> Clever! It even works. In fact, could the script below be modified so
>> that all continues to work if latex is found but is also found to no
Either I have still some serious mail troubles or everybody keeps
ignoring meeting related messages...
Andre'
I just wonder: Have the mailing lists been re-configured in any way such
that I don't receive my own mails anymore?
[Please reply to the list, private mail seems to be somewhat unreliable
at the moment...]
Andre'
23 matches
Mail list logo
