Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I don't have the energy to argue one way or the other. Too much
> | exercise is as bad as too litle.
>
> And you just leave me flumoxed(?).
Very good! Where _do_ you learn your English?!?
--
Angus
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>
> | Changes should be made so that the regular stl::algorithms can be used
> | with InsetIterator and DocIterator.
...and the bug is? Oh well...
> Hmm it seems that the DocIterator and StableDocIterator are not reall
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> At least I find it a bit nicer. Comments/Objections?
You go on to use 'MAX_CLIENTS' below, so don't cull it here:
Index: lyxsocket.C
- fd_(lyx::support::socktools::listen(addr, MAX_CLIENTS)),
+ fd_(lyx::support::socktools::listen(addr, 3)),
In Engl
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> At least I find it a bit nicer. Comments/Objections?
>
| You go on to use 'MAX_CLIENTS' below, so don't cull it here:
>
| Index: lyxsocket.C
| - fd_(lyx::support::socktools::listen(addr, MAX_CLIENTS)),
| +
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> So no substantial objections to this patch then?
Q (Angus): Do things continue to work after your patch is applied?
A (Lars): Of course, or else I would not be suggesting applying this patch.
What objection could I make, therefore, given that a feature freeze is
meani
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> So no substantial objections to this patch then?
>
| Q (Angus): Do things continue to work after your patch is applied?
| A (Lars): Of course, or else I would not be suggesting applying this patch.
So you are saying that I
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 01:38:33PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Here is an updated patch as well, gets rid fo the data_recieved
> function in qt socket_callback.
You've tested this carefully to make *sure* it works?
connect() does NO compile time checking. In fact, I'd be very surprised
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 01:38:33PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> Here is an updated patch as well, gets rid fo the data_recieved
>> function in qt socket_callback.
>
| You've tested this carefully to make *sure* it works?
No :-)
it is more "this
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 04:18:13PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> it is more "this should obviously work, else qt is braindead"... but
> we already know the answer to that I guess
Indeed.
It's best to not touch Qt /at all/ unless you're fully prepared to test
every changed line...
> Is it
Am Samstag, 17. Juli 2004 15:48 schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
> I don't care for that. BTW we also have
> \begin_inset LatexCommand \bibtex[bibtotoc,diss]{diss}
> or
> \begin_inset LatexCommand \bibtex[diss][btPrintCited]{diss}
> which does not even exist as a LaTeX command
> or
> \begin_inset Late
Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Samstag, 17. Juli 2004 15:48 schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
> > I don't care for that. BTW we also have
> > \begin_inset LatexCommand \bibtex[bibtotoc,diss]{diss}
> > or
> > \begin_inset LatexCommand \bibtex[diss][btPrintCited]{diss}
> > which does not even exist as a LaTeX co
11 matches
Mail list logo
