Angus Leeming wrote:
> Why don't we (you) just remove this cruft from src/insets
> (insettheorem too). They no longer compile, they aren't ver y complex
> anyway and can always be retrieved from the Attic.
There are no soonish plans for them? What is the use of the EXTRA_DIST
variable in insets/M
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
"Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
But can this really happen, or is it just a theoretical question?
Angus> (Aside: as a mathematician, I though you
Huaiyu Duan wrote:
Hi,
I use LyX a lot to document what I have done or write short technical
notes. It really saves time for me againts checking the grammar of
latex code. However, there is a problem when it comes to submiting
papers to journals. The equation part of the latex code exported by
Shall I just remove it, given that
1. Nobody uses it.
2. It will not be implemented in the Qt frontend.
I understand the reasoning for (2) and probably agree with it.
Executive summary: we have ps and kill for that and shouldn't
replicate system tools for no good reason.
--
Angus
On Tuesday 17 February 2004 09:46, Helge Hafting wrote:
>
> I've had one problem that forced me to not use temp dirs:
>
> Latex code (in ERT or in the preamble or in the preamble/textstyles
> of a custom document layout) may use \input, \includegraphics, or
> some other command that opens a user-pr
On Tuesday 17 February 2004 11:57, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Shall I just remove it, given that
>
> 1. Nobody uses it.
> 2. It will not be implemented in the Qt frontend.
> I understand the reasoning for (2) and probably agree with it.
> Executive summary: we have ps and kill for that and shouldn't
>
Jose' Matos wrote:
> On the other way most of your work has been in the direction of
> making the dialog unnecessary. ;-)
Unfortunately, we still use system a lot, invoking chktex, when
converting the lyx document to another format, in the version control
code.
Nonetheless, we do fork a *lo
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Shall I just remove it, given that 1. Nobody uses it. 2. It
Angus> will not be implemented in the Qt frontend.
Angus> I understand the reasoning for (2) and probably agree with it.
Angus> Executive summary: we have ps and kill for
- Original Message -
From: "Helge Hafting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Huaiyu Duan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 4:07 AM
Subject: Re: ugly latex code
> Huaiyu Duan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I use LyX a lot to document what I have done or write sh
> "Huaiyu" == Huaiyu Duan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Huaiyu> Hi, I use LyX a lot to document what I have done or write
Huaiyu> short technical notes. It really saves time for me againts
Huaiyu> checking the grammar of latex code. However, there is a
Huaiyu> problem when it comes to submiting
This is the second and hopefully last status update for LyX 1.3.4. I
would really like to release it this week. We lost a lot of time last
week chasing the german locale bug (which turned out to be a bug on
some xforms patch), but now I think everything is OK.
Things that remain to be done:
- de
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> This is the second and hopefully last status update for LyX 1.3.4. I
> would really like to release it this week. We lost a lot of time
> last week chasing the german locale bug (which turned out to be a
> bug on some xforms patch), but now I think everything is OK.
H
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> This is the second and hopefully last status update for LyX 1.3.4.
>> I would really like to release it this week. We lost a lot of time
>> last week chasing the german locale bug (which turned out to
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> When I asked some time ago the only bug that somebody (you?)
Georg> mentioned was dvi export. Bugzilla has bugs 643 and 1405 about
Georg> html export.
I am sorry I have not been more specific at the time.
Georg> I thought that the "
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 09:01:07AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Why don't we (you) just remove this cruft from src/insets
> > (insettheorem too). They no longer compile, they aren't ver y complex
> > anyway and can always be retrieved from the Attic.
>
> There are
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> This is the second and hopefully last status update for LyX 1.3.4. I
> would really like to release it this week. We lost a lot of time last
> week chasing the german locale bug (which turned out to be a bug on
> some xforms patch), but now I think everything is OK.
C
The patch tries to fix (the rest of) bug 1146
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1146
It always opens the find dialog if a new citation inset is being inserted (and
thus saves a few annoying keypresses).
Can some kind soul please review?
It works nicely, except for one thing: after applying
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Thanks a lot Angus. Here is the ANNOUNCE that I plan to commit soon.
I'd appreciate if you could take a quick look at it and maybe make it
sexier.
This is no sexier, but I think it explains the LyX/Mac changes more
accurately.
--
Ronald Florencewww.18james.com
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Can anyone reproduce the spellchecker crashes I reported this week?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lyx-devel&m=107652026519348&w=2
Would be nice if it could be fixed for 1.3.4
I saw crashes when spellchecking multiple documents when I was using
Aspell 0.50.4.1 with L
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Thanks a lot Angus. Here is the ANNOUNCE that I plan to commit soon.
> I'd appreciate if you could take a quick look at it and maybe make
> it sexier.
I don't understand what the part after the semi-colon means. Is it
just noise?
* support for old files from LyX 0
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> It works nicely, except for one thing: after applying (pressing
> apply, not ok) the find dialog is also opened (which is o.k.), but
> the bc().valid() call is not recognized: the buttons stay disabled.
> Any idea on this?
When you press Apply, you execute this code.
Ronald Florence wrote:
> I believe cocoAspell is based on an earlier version of aspell than the
> one I had been using, which leads me to suspect that the LyX crash
> problems are with some versions of aspell-0.50.x.
Hmm, yes, the backtrace also indicates that the spellchecker (i.e. aspell) has
c
Angus Leeming wrote:
> When you press Apply, you execute this code. So, I think that the
> behaviour you describe is to be expected.
I see. Anything I can do about that?
> Incidentally, I don't understand why the find dialog is opened when
> the user presses Apply in the main dialog. That feels v
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>> Incidentally, I don't understand why the find dialog is opened when
>> the user presses Apply in the main dialog. That feels very ugly to
>> me.
>
> It is because it also creates a new citation inset
No it doesn't. You can Apply to an existing inset.
What it does d
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 08:04:03PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Ronald Florence wrote:
> > I believe cocoAspell is based on an earlier version of aspell than the
> > one I had been using, which leads me to suspect that the LyX crash
> > problems are with some versions of aspell-0.50.x.
>
Angus Leeming wrote:
> No it doesn't. You can Apply to an existing inset.
>
> What it does do is disconnect from any existing inset so subsequently
> pressing Apply will create a new inset.
Yes, that's what I meant.
> > IMO this behaviour is ok because you have to open
> > that dialog anyway (the
John Levon wrote:
> Juergen, the spell code should be relatively debuggable. Where is the
> lyx crash happening ?
All I have is the backtrace I have posted. But this seems pretty clear:
#0 ControlSpellchecker::checkAlive() (this=0x876cbb4)
at ../../../boost/boost/scoped_ptr.hpp:77
#1 0x084d
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> He has. He has selected one or more new entries from the database.
> But he cannot apply them, although they show up in the "selected"
> browser. That's the problem. (I agree that the more elegant solution
> would be not to open find after apply. But I don't know how t
Am Dienstag, 17. Februar 2004 10:46 schrieb Helge Hafting:
> I've had one problem that forced me to not use temp dirs:
>
> Latex code (in ERT or in the preamble or in the preamble/textstyles
> of a custom document layout) may use \input, \includegraphics, or
> some other command that opens a user-
Am Dienstag, 17. Februar 2004 18:09 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> I am sorry I have not been more specific at the time.
Never mind, fortunately it does not change anything fundamental, at least I
hope so ;-)
> Georg> I thought that the "run in original dir" flag was used for html
> Georg> conv
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 08:28:50PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
> > Juergen, the spell code should be relatively debuggable. Where is the
> > lyx crash happening ?
>
> All I have is the backtrace I have posted. But this seems pretty clear:
>
> #0 ControlSpellchecker::c
From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Huaiyu Duan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ugly latex code
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:40:50 +0100
I think that there are a lot of small things we could do to improve
the output of equations. However, we will never be able t
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 08:24:14PM -0600, Huaiyu Duan wrote:
> I use LyX a lot to document what I have done or write short technical
> notes. It really saves time for me againts checking the grammar of latex
> code. However, there is a problem when it comes to submiting papers to
> journals. Th
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 09:15:03AM -0600, Huaiyu Duan wrote:
> I did and got the same result. It is a little bit wierd. Latex is
> more or less like a programming language, but no one writes a
> beautifying script for it.
I guess that's simply because (La)TeX syntax is highly convoluted if not
mes
34 matches
Mail list logo
