[Patch] AGU header work

2003-12-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 04:11:02PM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly: > On Wednesday 17 December 2003 16:15, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > In docbook the whole header-like stuff is at the same depth as the > > > usual sections for that style ( section for articles and chapters for > > > book) so th

Re: [Patch] AGU header work

2003-12-22 Thread Jose' Matos
On Monday 22 December 2003 08:39, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Here is some further work on the AGU header. It starts looking really > good now. See > > http://www.hut.fi/~mvermeer/agu_pic.jpeg > > (some changes were made after that still) I don't like your notation for the display name, it

Re: [Patch] AGU header work

2003-12-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 09:03:53AM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly: > On Monday 22 December 2003 08:39, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > > Here is some further work on the AGU header. It starts looking really > > good now. See > > > > http://www.hut.fi/~mvermeer/agu_pic.jpeg > > > > (some changes

Re: [Patch] AGU header work

2003-12-22 Thread Jose' Matos
On Monday 22 December 2003 09:40, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Neither have I... would a simple blue label without the <> do better? > Possibly with a colon ("AGU-journal: ") That I like, also the point is to be consistent for all styles. The principle os least surprise. > Perhaps for Title and A

g-brief question

2003-12-22 Thread Michael Schmitt
Hello, short question - hopefully short answer: Why do we need g-brief2-en and g-brief2-de? Wouldn't one layout file be enough? I ask this because it does not really make much fun to translate the same messages again and again. If we can get rid of one of these layout files that would be very

Re: g-brief question

2003-12-22 Thread Michael Schmitt
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Since you speak german better that I do, I propose that you investigate the matter :) We should probably get rid of g-brief2-de, rename g-brief2-en to g-brief2 (and maybe do something about g-brief too). Felix, do you think that we need both classes, if the environment

Re: [Patch] AGU header work

2003-12-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 09:45:31AM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly: > > That we are on the right track. :-) > -- > José Abílio Next attempt, fresh screenshot (in the earlier announced place) - Martin Index: layouts/agu_stdclass.inc

Re: new versions of seminar.layout and dinbrief.layout

2003-12-22 Thread Christian Ridderström
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Günter Milde wrote: > Also, it would be nice to have the Contributed Stuff page > http://www.lyx.org/download/contrib.php3 > updated with a link from "Additional layout files" to the layout wiki. I've attached a patch with changes the text so that it refers to the wiki-wi

Re: [Patch] AGU header work

2003-12-22 Thread Jose' Matos
On Monday 22 December 2003 13:12, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Next attempt, fresh screenshot (in the earlier announced place) No further objections. :-) > - Martin -- José Abílio

Re: [PATCH] Minipage removal

2003-12-22 Thread Michael Schmitt
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: I think this can go in. Don't know what Angus' current plans about moving the minipage->box conversion from 225 to 228 are, though. So I'd wait for his vote. If all this patch does is prevent new Miniboxes being created, then great. Of course I vote for it to go in. Ho

Re: g-brief question

2003-12-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Michael" == Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Michael> Hello, short question - hopefully short answer: Michael> Why do we need g-brief2-en and g-brief2-de? Wouldn't one Michael> layout file be enough? Michael> I ask this because it does not really make much fun to Michael> trans

Re: [PATCH] Minipage removal

2003-12-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 03:58:52PM +0100, Michael Schmitt spake thusly: > Enclosed please find a slightly modified patch again the current HEAD > that "improves" the button label for boxes (the text "parbox" or > "minipage" alone is a bit misleading UI-wise, especially as you may > think that m

Re: [Patch] AGU header work

2003-12-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 02:49:14PM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly: > On Monday 22 December 2003 13:12, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > > Next attempt, fresh screenshot (in the earlier announced place) > > No further objections. :-) > > > - Martin > > -- > José Abílio It's in. - Martin pg

Re: LyX/Mac patch for 1.4.0cvs

2003-12-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Ronald" == Ronald Florence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ronald> The attached patch: A few comments of my own for the other's enjoyment: Ronald> 1. Enables compilation of 1.4.0cvs on MacOSX (qfont_loader.C, Ronald> math_symbolinset.C, support/tostr.[Ch]). This should be fairly uncontrover

Re: [PATCH] Minipage removal

2003-12-22 Thread Michael Schmitt
Michael Schmitt wrote: Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: I think this can go in. Don't know what Angus' current plans about moving the minipage->box conversion from 225 to 228 are, though. So I'd wait for his vote. If all this patch does is prevent new Miniboxes being created, then great. Of course I