> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Edwin> named? how?
>> Toobar "main" Icon ... EndToolbar
>>
>> Toolbar "tabular" Icon ... EndToolbar
>>
>> Toolbar "math" Icon ... EndToolbar
>>
>> Then the toolbar frontend would have to handle a vect
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 08:39:39PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> The following patch allows showing all symbols when using the QT frontend in
> RH8 (it fixes \Box, \Diamond, \cong, and \surd), and also improve the
> appearance of other symbols.
Ok.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 05:56:50PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
>> Basically the rule I have in mind is "if the dialog requires me to
>> press OK to actually do its task, then I need ...". Or something
>> like that.
John> Gn
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Do you mean that there is no bug? I do not see why this windows
>> gets opened, since there is nothing to do there (note that this
>> does not heppen for list of figures).
John> I didn't mean that. I think it's wrong.
I'll try to propose
> "Anand" == Anand Rangarajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Anand> On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 12:10, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 04:13:00PM +, John Levon wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 11:07:36AM -0500, Anand Rangarajan wrote:
>> > > 2. When I type Control-M a number of t
John Levon wrote:
MAybe I misunderstand the patch (you forgot to describe it). I expected
that what happened was basically what I suggested.
If it just adds all the non-available classes to the combo always, I am
against the patch.
You proposed an option in the document dialog, didn't you? In
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Thats the only regression that we have... we used to convert the doc
into "Article".
BTW: Has anybody ever checked what happens if LaTeX is not installed at
all?
(this is a scenario we must anticipate if people try out our Windows Qt
port)
Michael
--
=
> "Michael" == Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Thats the only regression that we have... we used to convert the
>> doc into "Article".
>>
Michael> BTW: Has anybody ever checked what happens if LaTeX is not
Michael> installed at all? (this is
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 09:46:38AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre', could you document all these small annoying changes in the
> NEWS file? This would maybe help (although rpm users do not get to see
> NEWS).
We have:
However, it was not possible to tweak the visible behaviour to mim
I have moved the items linespacing and encoding from packages to more obvious
sections (layout resp. language). However, I have kept the packages section
for "use AMS" and "PS driver", but moved it down in the browser (just before
preamble). I don't know a better place (I thought about a math an
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 11:23:04AM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> BTW: qt's geometry management *really* sucks. Why is the document
> dialog that large (height)? I just cannot change this. And in german
> translation, I get a vertical scrollbar in the module ListBox, because
> "Aufzählungszei
I think I sent this to the list a while ago without receiving any
comments.
Ok to apply?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Index: formulabase.C
===
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> What about "Anstriche"? No more wrong than "bullets"...
Maybe. But I thought qt is a bit more clever than xforms, where german
translations always caused trouble, namely "Aufzählungszeichen".
Jürgen.
> Objections? Edwin, could you please apply if there are none?
applied
> BTW: qt's geometry management *really* sucks. Why is the document dialog
> that large (height)? I just cannot change this.
It has something todo with the bullet item panel
Ed.
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> We have:
Andre> However, it was not possible to tweak the visible behaviour to
Andre> mimic 1.2 in all cases, so this might take some time to get
Andre> accustomed to. On the pro side, the new structure allowed
Andre> implementing
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Objections? Edwin, could you please apply if there are none?
|
| applied
What bug did this fix?
--
Lgb
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I think I sent this to the list a while ago without receiving any
| comments.
|
| Ok to apply?
Ok, but this will be the last patch that does not fix a regression or
crash.
--
Lgb
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:07:56PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> You could maybe document the changes of { and also fonts, since people
> will be bugging you about that.
Attached.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve,
> What bug did this fix?
that linespacing was on the wrong panel
As of _now_ only patches that:
- fix regressions
- fix crashes
will be applied o CVS.
There will be one more prerelease, and then (unless something really
ugly shows up.)
Be _very_ conservative.
--
Lgb
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > What bug did this fix?
|
| that linespacing was on the wrong panel
Was that _really_ a bug?
but ok... from now on until 1.3.0 is release such changes are not
allowed.
--
Lgb
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> What bug did this fix?
I don't recall the number (as bugzilla is down), but it was assigned as a
major bug.
Jürgen
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:28:56PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Ok to apply?
>
> Ok, but this will be the last patch that does not fix a regression or
> crash.
Oh, it prevents my head from crashing on the table ;-}
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Securit
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:30:58PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> There will be one more prerelease, and then (unless something really
> ugly shows up.)
>
> Be _very_ conservative.
*gasp*
Does that mean the 12460 lines I have in lyx-devel/patches/*.diff
won't make it into 1.3?
What a naug
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:30:58PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > There will be one more prerelease, and then (unless something really
| > ugly shows up.)
| >
| > Be _very_ conservative.
|
| *gasp*
|
| Does that mean the 12460 lines I have in
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 01:01:50PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I am not sure you will be allowed to push all those diffs at once
I did not intend to do that.
> (or all those lins if it is really only one diff.)
21 diffs... Most of them won't apply anymore I guess...
Andre'
--
Those wh
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>As of _now_ only patches that:
>
>- fix regressions
>- fix crashes
>
>will be applied o CVS.
What does this mean with regard to the text class patch? You agreed that
there is some kind of regression although I might not have solved it in
the simplest wa
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 09:37:04AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> You proposed an option in the document dialog, didn't you? In that case,
no
> I need some help by a frontend developer (both QT and xforms). Is
> anybody willing to help me finish this stuff?
My activation date for ADSL is to
Garst R. Reese wrote:
Michael Schmitt wrote:
if it is not available, why now show "xxx not available" for only that
particular doc? Or, simply, "LyX display"
But if John does not like the term "N/A" in the choice box, he will also
not like "not available" in the corresponding field.
In Lay
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 02:51:31PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> >>>if it is not available, why now show "xxx not available" for only that
> >>>particular doc? Or, simply, "LyX display"
> >>>
> But if John does not like the term "N/A" in the choice box, he will also
> not like "not available" i
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 11:23:04AM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> BTW: qt's geometry management *really* sucks. Why is the document dialog that
> large (height)? I just cannot change this. And in german translation, I get a
I don't know.
> vertical scrollbar in the module ListBox, becaus
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:32:35PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | that linespacing was on the wrong panel
>
> Was that _really_ a bug?
*I* (me !!) got confused ! And as I am obviously supremely important ...
john
--
"I could have reasons to back up my gut feeling that the web sucks
flo
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 01:50:02PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> What does this mean with regard to the text class patch? You agreed that
> there is some kind of regression although I might not have solved it in
> the simplest way.
It can wait till 1.3.1
thinking about it the fact it fiddles w
John Levon wrote:
No, what Garst is suggesting is what I did. It is ONLY shown for such
documents.
I reckon "blah (not available)" makes sense
I am puzzled...
I thought that your proposal was to introduce a new button (with on/off
behavior) into the GUI that allows to switch between "all ava
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 03:09:01PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> I thought that your proposal was to introduce a new button (with on/off
> behavior) into the GUI that allows to switch between "all available
> classes" and "all classes" in the choice box. Garst doesn't mention
That was someb
Is that possible in theory?
LaTeX/Dvi/Ps output looks wierd... (Table as text export without
linebreaks)
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
On Thursday 16 January 2003 14:37, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Is that possible in theory?
Yes, it is. But I never saw such an example file.
Reading the dtd it almost looks like a latex definition, but man it is
weird, really weird. And without any simple example to understand the logic I
never i
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 02:54:42PM +, José Matos wrote:
> > LaTeX/Dvi/Ps output looks wierd... (Table as text export without
> > linebreaks)
>
> We export the text not the formating...
And parts of the table lines, and TeX eats the linefeeds. So it looks
awful...
Andre'
--
Those who des
This patch fixes the inset insertion mechanism, which had been
refactored sometime in the 1.3.0 timeline. What it does is mainly to
move code around.
There are 3 types of insets:
1/ those who can contain text. In this case, we want to put the inset
in edit mode and move any selected text insi
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| This patch fixes the inset insertion mechanism, which had been
| refactored sometime in the 1.3.0 timeline. What it does is mainly to
| move code around.
|
| There are 3 types of insets:
|
| 1/ those who can contain text. In this case, we want
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 03:53:12PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I put the existing code in a new function doInsertInset() waith extra
> parameters tweaking what I described above.
I'd rather put that into three separate functions instead of this if/else
cascade, even if that means duplicat
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 03:53:12PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> I put the existing code in a new function doInsertInset() waith
>> extra parameters tweaking what I described above.
Andre> I'd rather put that into th
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 04:37:00PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> The if/else structure is exactly what it used to be. I only added one
> "if (edit)" and one "&& pastesel". So the structure would not be
> simpler, I think. But if you watn to have three times the same code in
> the switch, tha
Garst R. Reese wrote:
My proposal would be to list only available classes and if the document
being viewed uses an unavailable class, list that class with (not
available) appended,
or maybe just give it a coloured background.
So this has nothing to do with whether the user is able to select a
Hello,
here comes an update for all example files (.../lib/examples) to lyx
format 221.
I roughly checked the conversion. It look reasonable at first glance.
Lars, Jean-Marc? Could you apply it, please?
(I guess this patch is even possible in the feature freeze period)
Michael
--
... and the same for the templates files.
The usual procedure: Nod and commit, please :-)
Michael
--
===
Michael Schmitt Telefon: +49 651 97551-40
Institut für TelematikTelefax: +49 651 97
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 05:01:31PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> So this has nothing to do with whether the user is able to select a
> missing class or not.
I do not believe we have any good reason to support *creating* a file
with a non-installed class.
regards
john
--
"Q: Name a non-livin
John Levon wrote:
I do not believe we have any good reason to support *creating* a file
with a non-installed class.
Sigh. So all the discussion was more or less superfluous. (But I
remember Jean-Marc was of a different opinion)
I will change my fix according to Garst's proposal, integrate Lar
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 05:01:31PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
|
| > So this has nothing to do with whether the user is able to select a
| > missing class or not.
|
| I do not believe we have any good reason to support *creating* a file
| with a non-in
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 04:23:31PM +, John Levon wrote:
> > So this has nothing to do with whether the user is able to select a
> > missing class or not.
>
> I do not believe we have any good reason to support *creating* a file
> with a non-installed class.
I have created .tex files on machi
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 04:23:31PM +, John Levon wrote:
| > > So this has nothing to do with whether the user is able to select a
| > > missing class or not.
| >
| > I do not believe we have any good reason to support *creating* a file
| > with a n
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 05:46:05PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I think that we should allow all classes _always_, and rather give a
> warning if there is some operation we cannot do because of this.
That's what I think, too.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 05:39:56PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I have created .tex files on machines without TeX installed. I can imagine
> a similar scenario for working with LyX.
Hrmmph. I suppose I could live with the classes being listed on the end,
suffixed with " (not available)"
> PS: I
Just to make you feel a bit uneasy: I just managed to crash LyX with a
series of undo/redo operations and the emergency savefile was corrupted
(everything lost behind cursor position).
Not reproducible of course ;-|
We should have a look at this at some point of time...
Andre'
--
Those who de
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 04:50:21PM +, John Levon wrote:
> This is how mathed ended up with such baffling features.
Sure.
But I have heard of people using LyX _because_ of mathed.
I've not heard of people using LyX because it disallows doing
things.
Strange, isn't it?
Andre'
--
Those who
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 05:56:21PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> But I have heard of people using LyX _because_ of mathed.
That's because it's pretty much great.
> I've not heard of people using LyX because it disallows doing
> things.
If you think usability is a binary value, we're in more tro
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 04:59:24PM +, John Levon wrote:
> If you think usability is a binary value, we're in more trouble than I
> thought.
I just think our ideas of "usable" differ.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve,
I used insert lyx file to insert another file into an appendix. It
wiped out *everything* but the new file! Undo gave me back only the
most recent paragraph upon which I was working.
Fortunately, I had just saved.
hawk, heart still pounding
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics/
Hi, Folks!
we are just discussing about a few more lines at the end of choice box.
Nothing more! And they are not even visible when you open the choice box
- at least with xforms frontend. There is no need for an emotional
discussion on the overall usefulness of mathed in this context.
I am re
On Thursday 16 January 2003 14:50, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> > We export the text not the formating...
>
> And parts of the table lines, and TeX eats the linefeeds. So it looks
> awful...
That is a task for 1.3.1. You heard Lars. :-)
> Andre'
--
José Abílio
"Dr. Richard E. Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I used insert lyx file to insert another file into an appendix. It
| wiped out *everything* but the new file! Undo gave me back only the
| most recent paragraph upon which I was working.
|
| Fortunately, I had just saved.
|
| hawk, heart s
"Dr. Richard E. Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I used insert lyx file to insert another file into an appendix. It
| wiped out *everything* but the new file! Undo gave me back only the
| most recent paragraph upon which I was working.
|
| Fortunately, I had just saved.
Am I correct in g
Hi,
just made a fresh build for win32. This fixes the dialog crashes.
It's available at:
http://www.home.zonnet.nl/rareitsma/lyx/
All the patches are over there also. Is anyone still interested in adding
some of it to CVS, or should I just stop asking?
Cheers,
Ruurd
Btw, this was what caused
I was messing about following links on www.devel.lyx.org just now.
The following are dead:
mirror.php3:
http://www.mx.lyx.org/es
translation.php3:
Bulgarian, http://www26.brinkster.com/lyxbg/
Dutch, http://people.a2000.nl/amein/lyx.html
Hebrew, http://www.technion.a
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Shall I clean them up (in ruthless fashion) ?
yes, please.
--
Lgb
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:12:46PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> "Dr. Richard E. Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I used insert lyx file to insert another file into an appendix. It
> | wiped out *everything* but the new file! Undo gave me back only the
> | most recent paragraph u
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Shall I clean them up (in ruthless fashion) ?
>
> yes, please.
I attach the patch to www-devel as I don't have php on this machine. Should
be OK though. I also attach a small script to remove trailing whitespace
fro
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 02:40:08AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Index: lib/lyx2lyx/lyxconvert_218.py
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/lib/lyx2lyx/lyxconvert_218.py,v
> retrieving revision 1.28
> diff -u -r1.28 lyxconvert_218.py
Hi,
thanks to my text class patch (*wink*), I was able to detect errors in
three layout files (llncs/cv/egs). Patch attached.
Michael
Currently uncommitted patches:
- fix for layout files
- reLyX / lyx2lyx
- example files update
- template files update
Index: lyx-devel-1.3.Xcvs/lib/layo
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 02:40:08AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> > Index: lib/lyx2lyx/lyxconvert_218.py
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/lib/lyx2lyx/lyxconvert_218.py,v
> > retrieving
Hi,
I have fixed a small bug in my "missing TeX class" patch, simplified the
code, and changed "N/A:" to "No TeX:" (In the dialog, it looks better if
we use a _short_ prefix instead of a postfix).
If you like to, you can test the patch. Eagerly awaiting 1.3.1,
Michael
Index: lyx-devel-1.3.Xcvs
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:58:09PM +0100, Ruurd Reitsma wrote:
> All the patches are over there also. Is anyone still interested in adding
> some of it to CVS, or should I just stop asking?
Of course we are (though probably not right *now*).
It would help if you could send one mail with one patc
Lars, what does this mean? Michael
*
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
chmod: failed to get attributes of `reLyX': No such file or directory
chmod: failed to get attributes of `noweb2lyx': No su
Hi LyX developers
I just installed Lyx1.3.0pre2 and must say it looks very impressive -
congratulations!
One problem I had was that I only have the multithreaded qt3.0.5 lib
(-lqt-mt) installed. This is the library required by KDE >3.0, whereas the
LyX compile only looked for libqt (-lqt). I manu
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 05:02:52PM -0800, John Keane wrote:
> One problem I had was that I only have the multithreaded qt3.0.5 lib
> (-lqt-mt) installed. This is the library required by KDE >3.0, whereas the
> LyX compile only looked for libqt (-lqt). I manually edited the makefile
> to use qt-mt
Hi all,
Running 130cvs (current) under qt, preview snippets come up black.
Changing the colour in preferences doesn't seem to have any effect.
As I run a blue background, it makes it a little hard to read.
Rod
_
rod | "Beneath th
Sort of ignore me...I need to restart lyx to get it recognised.
Rod
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Rod Pinna wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Running 130cvs (current) under qt, preview snippets come up black.
> Changing the colour in preferences doesn't seem to have any effect.
>
> As I run a blue background, it m
Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars, what does this mean? Michael
Not sure. Read config.status and find out.
--
Lgb
78 matches
Mail list logo
