John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 01:56:05AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>
> Send an example app to [EMAIL PROTECTED], they are quite responsive
I'm sending this example to QT
//#define QT_THREAD_SUPPORT
#include
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
QApplication a(argc,arg
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 08:31:27PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
|
| > This has been reported, but the QT frontend still does not compile:
| >
| > FileDialog.C:60: ambiguous overload for string & = const QString'
| > FileDialog.C:90: ambiguous overload for str
Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| ... if you shrink its size too much.
xforms or qt?
--
Lgb
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| ... if you shrink its size too much.
xforms or qt?
xforms.
Michael
Whoa, Kuba,
that was a pretty interesting reply. Thanks!!!
Yeah we never said it was compression, it was a sarcastic joke against
M$ to say that we compress our files by saving them over and over =)
On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 03:43, Kuba Ober wrote:
> > size. So if your file won't fit on floppy, do
On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 00:01, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 09:49:56AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > I'd rather make .lyx gzipped by default. Doesn't Staroffice do something
> > similar?
>
> Lets look at the bloat first. You don't fix kernel bugs first by running
> 3 redundant ma
ΪӽÓÊ¥µ®¡¢Ôªµ©£¬ÉîÛÚÍøÂçÊéµêÌØÍƳöÒ»Åúµç×ÓͼÊé¼°ÌؼÛÐÂÊé¡£ÄúÖ»Ð軨298Ôª¼´¿ÉÓµÓÐÒ»×ù3000²áͼÊéµÄ¼ÒͥͼÊé¹Ý¡£
»áÒé¡¢¸öÈ˽»ÍùÖеÄÀ¡Ôù¾«Æ·
¸öÈËÊղصÄÕäÆ·¡¢Ñ§Ï°µÄ¹¤¾ßÊé
µ¥Î»½±ÀøÔ±¹¤µÄÉϼѽ±Æ·¼°¼ÍÄîÆ·
¹Ø°®º¢×ӳɳ¤µÄÌùÉíÀñÎï
µç×ÓͼÊéĿ¼£º
¼ÒÍ¥²ØÊ鼯½õ£¨10CD£©298Ôª
ÖлªÀúÊ·È«¼¯£¨11CD£©
Hi there,
as I mentioned already in an earlier email, german indexes are not sorted properly.
When I tried to track that
down, I came to line 380 (?) of file LaTeX.C which reads
string tmp = "makeindex -c -q ";
If I replace that line by
string tmp = "makeindex -c -q -g -s /path
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 11:45:45AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | we should build with -DQT_NO_STL
>
> What does this signify for Qt?
Some Qt versions have automatic std::string <-> QString
But it never seems to be a problem on my machine ...
regards
john
--
"ALL television is children
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 10:51:42PM +1030, Darren Freeman wrote:
> I agree in principle, but would like to see tests to show which activity
> is actually more productive. Remember that shrinking the symbol names
Why would we do that ?
> shouldn't have much of an effect on the gzip file size.. You
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Samstag, 21. Dezember 2002 01:56, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
> > I've got this ever since upgrading to RH* / Qt 3...
>
> The following patch cures it. I think it's simply a qt bug. It seems that
> QApplication destructor assumes that QApplic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Samstag, 21. Dezember 2002 15:30, Kornel Benko wrote:
> yx_gui.C: In function `void lyx_gui::exit()':
> lyx_gui.C:177: no matching function for call to `QApplication::unlock()'
Sorry, I should investigate first.
Defining -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT would have made
Kornel Benko wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> On Samstag, 21. Dezember 2002 15:30, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> yx_gui.C: In function `void lyx_gui::exit()':
>> lyx_gui.C:177: no matching function for call to `QApplication::unlock()'
>
>
> Sorry, I should investigate first.
> Defining
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Err... wasn't already defined on the patch? Anyway, we are waiting for
> Qt's solution. Bye, Alfredo
I mean: Trolltech's solution. :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Samstag, 21. Dezember 2002 16:18, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Err... wasn't already defined on the patch? Anyway, we are waiting for Qt's
> solution. Bye, Alfredo
You are right ... I suffer under the consequencies of
manually patching (cut & paste with the mo
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 10:51:42PM +1030, Darren Freeman spake thusly:
...
> But as for eliminating symbols altogether by more intelligent use of
> defaults, I'd say: go for it! That will shave off some data.
>
> But before making the statement definitive, I had another go. I removed
> what I t
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 01:37:34PM +0100, Hartmut Haase spake thusly:
> Hi there,
> as I mentioned already in an earlier email, german indexes are not sorted properly.
>When I tried to track that
> down, I came to line 380 (?) of file LaTeX.C which reads
>
> string tmp = "makeindex -c -q
Hi Andre,
when you activate latex preview for math formula, there is a cursor problem:
- Click at a formula in preview mode with the mouse
- The formula appears in editing mode
- Click at some plain text around the math formula with the mouse
- The cursor jumps to a completely different place
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 07:51:22PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> That solves the German problem... an ugly case of special-casing. What
> about providing xindy as an option? I can attest it works great -- the
> main problem appears to be a dependence on a particular version of
> clisp.
There's a
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 02:20:08AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> If I open some of the LyX menus, I get the following console message:
>
> LyXAction::funcHasFlag: No info about kb_action: -1073748040
>
> valgrind tells me the following:
which menus exactly ? xforms frontend ?? I thought
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 08:31:27PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> FileDialog.C:60: ambiguous overload for string & = const QString'
> FileDialog.C:90: ambiguous overload for string & = const QString'
> QBibtex.C:79: call of overloaded basic_string(const QString)' is ambiguous
Should be OK now
regard
Hi.. I compiled the cvs version on my ibook yesterday.. I'm running
Debian Woody (with a modified kernel).. compilation went fine but when I
start the program it crashes immediately.. looks like some problem with
libc.. glib-config --version says 1.2.10 and gcc --version says
2.95.4... below is the
I am finally completely operational again and have built the xforms-1.0
release RPMs and lyx-1.2.2 RPMs.
Would everyone else who has built the RPMs point me to their versions
(with any system-identifying information, for example: built on RH-8.0
against which version of xforms)?
I would like to c
Answering my own email
> P.S. I just noticed that my compiled lyx is not using the shared xforms
> library. Does anyone have any idea as to why this might be happening??!!
I was missing the libforms.so and libflimage.so links (these are not
updated by ldconfig).
Should I adjust the xforms RP
24 matches
Mail list logo
