Re: web page changes

2001-08-23 Thread Zvezdan Petkovic
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 07:23:48AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 02:55:54PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Baruch Even wrote: > > > > > Just to end this thread, the format is now 2001-08-32 > > > > Someone added an extra day to August! > > Now all my cal

Re: web page changes

2001-08-22 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 02:55:54PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Baruch Even wrote: > > > Just to end this thread, the format is now 2001-08-32 > > Someone added an extra day to August! > Now all my calenders are wrong! > I'll have to reprogram all my clocks and watches! Not re

Re: web page changes

2001-08-22 Thread Allan Rae
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Baruch Even wrote: > Just to end this thread, the format is now 2001-08-32 OH NO! Someone added an extra day to August! Now all my calenders are wrong! I'll have to reprogram all my clocks and watches! Allan. (ARRae)

Re: web page changes

2001-08-22 Thread Baruch Even
* Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010823 07:00]: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 08:59:05AM -0400, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:25:39AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > > Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > | However I don't care how this is output on t

Re: web page changes

2001-08-22 Thread Amir Karger
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 08:59:05AM -0400, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:25:39AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > | However I don't care how this is output on the web-page (we could maybe > > | have a look at the prefere

Re: web page changes

2001-08-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
> In fact it doesn't matter. The only fact is that Lars is being stubborn, That's one of the few things we can rely on nowadays. And you say it as if it were something bad... Andre' -- André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: web page changes

2001-08-21 Thread Zvezdan Petkovic
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 12:10:04PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > Zvezdan Petkovic wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:25:39AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > > Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > | However I don't care how this is output on the web-page (we could mayb

Re: web page changes

2001-08-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
> i learned in school august, 3rd ... :-) We used to have summer holidays on August 3rd... SCNR, Andre' -- André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: web page changes

2001-08-21 Thread Herbert Voss
Zvezdan Petkovic wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:25:39AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > | However I don't care how this is output on the web-page (we could maybe > > | have a look at the prefered language set in the browser and have a

Re: web page changes

2001-08-21 Thread Zvezdan Petkovic
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:25:39AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | However I don't care how this is output on the web-page (we could maybe > | have a look at the prefered language set in the browser and have a list > | of date-formats and output

Re: web page changes

2001-08-20 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 20-Aug-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > My point is more "if you don't know the standard 2001-08-03 is still > confusing". IMO it's not confusing this is the only right solution for putting a date. This way you're able to "sort" it without problems. I for myself use most of the time (intern

Re: web page changes

2001-08-20 Thread Zvezdan Petkovic
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:43:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > | Common Lars. > > Hmrppf... are you belittling me? ( :-) ) > :-) -- Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/

Re: web page changes

2001-08-20 Thread Baruch Even
* Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010820 23:51]: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 07:39:14PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote: > > Output looks like: > > Page last updated on August 3, 2001. > > Why not make it according to international standard: 2001-08-03? I really don't care, I feel that spelling the

Re: web page changes

2001-08-20 Thread Zvezdan Petkovic
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:21:08PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 07:39:14PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote: > | > Output looks like: > | > Page last updated on August 3, 2001. > | > | Why not make it according to internat

Re: web page changes

2001-08-20 Thread Zvezdan Petkovic
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 07:39:14PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote: > Output looks like: > Page last updated on August 3, 2001. Why not make it according to international standard: 2001-08-03? -- Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/

web page changes

2001-08-20 Thread Baruch Even
I've commited the changes proposed for the web page. That is, Changing "CCP2000 is sponsoring" to "CCP2000 sponsored" and, adding a last modified date on the bottom of each page, this is done with Output looks like: Page last updated on August 3, 2001. -- Baruch Even http://baruch.ev-en.org/