On Monday 04 November 2002 11:33 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 10:47:00AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > No, the warning is generated in MathArray::notifyCursorLeaves()
> > immediately below your snippet:
> > // glue adjacent font insets of the same kind
> > for (pos_t
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 12:47:53PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | But it is a '-1' which takes care of the one item removed by erase().
> | It is not the 'npos' concept ("last thing in a string").
>
> npos is "not a position"
Erm. Yes.
Nevertheless, I still mean '-1' in the sense of 'one
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 10:47:00AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> No, the warning is generated in MathArray::notifyCursorLeaves() immediately
>> below your snippet:
>> // glue adjacent font insets of the same kind
>> for (pos_type i = 0; i + 1
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 10:47:00AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> No, the warning is generated in MathArray::notifyCursorLeaves() immediately
> below your snippet:
> // glue adjacent font insets of the same kind
> for (pos_type i = 0; i + 1 < size(); ++i) {
> MathFontInset
On Monday 04 November 2002 10:28 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 05:03:28PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > I won't do that because I'm not at all sure that this code is safe if it
> > receives
> > size = (size_type)-1;
> > Should you not add a test that size is valid? Wh
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 05:03:28PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I won't do that because I'm not at all sure that this code is safe if it
> receives
> size = (size_type)-1;
> Should you not add a test that size is valid? What should you do if it
> isn't?
Are we still talking about
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 04:32:14PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> André, I have a warning when compiling math_data.C. Wouldn't it be more
>> elegant/comprehensible to define a MathCursor::npos if you're saying that
>> the value is now invalid?
>
> Why not. Apply it if you w
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 04:32:14PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> André, I have a warning when compiling math_data.C. Wouldn't it be more
> elegant/comprehensible to define a MathCursor::npos if you're saying that
> the value is now invalid?
Why not. Apply it if you want (I am off now for the wee
André, I have a warning when compiling math_data.C. Wouldn't it be more
elegant/comprehensible to define a MathCursor::npos if you're saying that
the value is now invalid?
cxx: Warning: ../../../src/mathed/math_data.C, line 411: #68-D integer
conversion resulted in a change of sign
