Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Monday 24 June 2002 2:10 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | ??? It does.
>>
>> Then what it the problem with distributing an up to date form_about.c?
>>
>> | Not only does all work perfectly for me, but the Makefile.am
>> | looks fine too. However,
On Monday 24 June 2002 2:10 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | ??? It does.
>
> Then what it the problem with distributing an up to date form_about.c?
>
> | Not only does all work perfectly for me, but the Makefile.am
> | looks fine too. However, I'm no expert and you are. Could you have a look
>
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Monday 24 June 2002 1:28 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | On Monday 24 June 2002 11:28 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> >> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> | All the forms/form_*.[Ch] fi
On Monday 24 June 2002 1:28 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On Monday 24 June 2002 11:28 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> | All the forms/form_*.[Ch] files are now autogenerated. As such, you'll
> >> |
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Monday 24 June 2002 11:28 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | All the forms/form_*.[Ch] files are now autogenerated. As such, you'll
>> | probably find them in your build tree, not your src tree.
>>
>> One
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 11:29:52AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> 1. What is wrong with forcing the users to install fdesign? It's the
> appropriate compilation tool. (You insist on a C== compiler for .C code...)
> In effect, you are special-casing the xforms frontend. The qt frontend will
> req
On Monday 24 June 2002 11:28 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | All the forms/form_*.[Ch] files are now autogenerated. As such, you'll
> | probably find them in your build tree, not your src tree.
>
> One note though... I do not agree to when this is gen
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 11:14:04AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > I looked in either. Some of the form_*.[Ch] were there, some not (_about*
> > was missing, too)
>
> You mean both...
I looked in both. That should include either, shouldn't it?
> Linguistic splitting of hairs aside,
Oh... ;-}
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| All the forms/form_*.[Ch] files are now autogenerated. As such, you'll
| probably find them in your build tree, not your src tree.
One note though... I do not agree to when this is generated, now you
generate upon compile, right? It should be done on
On Monday 24 June 2002 11:16 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:58:44AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > All the forms/form_*.[Ch] files are now autogenerated. As such, you'll
> > probably find them in your build tree, not your src tree.
>
> I looked in either. Some of the form_*
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:58:44AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> All the forms/form_*.[Ch] files are now autogenerated. As such, you'll
> probably find them in your build tree, not your src tree.
I looked in either. Some of the form_*.[Ch] were there, some not (_about*
was missing, too)
Anyway.
On Monday 24 June 2002 11:04 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Can anybody please explain to me in simple words the variable naming in the
> following snippet taken from FormDialog.C?
>
> void UserCache::add(uid_t ID) const
> {
> string pszNewName;
>
Can anybody please explain to me in simple words the variable naming in the
following snippet taken from FormDialog.C?
void UserCache::add(uid_t ID) const
{
string pszNewName;
[...]
It almost made me spill tea over the keyboard together with some
13 matches
Mail list logo
