On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> If we do that we could
>> 1/ introduce a way to define these forms easily (although then people will
>> be clamoring for real macros in text)
>>
>> 2/ extend the autocorrect mechanism of mathed to texted.
>
> Wha
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> If we do that we could
> 1/ introduce a way to define these forms easily (although then people will be
> clamoring for real macros in text)
>
> 2/ extend the autocorrect mechanism of mathed to texted.
What would you think about some layout mechanism which can be put
On 09/15/2012 06:20 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
There is no easier solution now.
The last time there was a plan for these phrases, it was to remove
them and introduce ad-hoc insets instead.
If we do that we could
1/ introduce a way to define these forms easily (although then people
will
There is no easier solution now.
The last time there was a plan for these phrases, it was to remove them and
introduce ad-hoc insets instead.
If we do that we could
1/ introduce a way to define these forms easily (although then people will be
clamoring for real macros in text)
2/ extend the au
This topic came up twice in the last couple of days:
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/71550/globally-set-a-word-in-small-caps-or-italics/71591
http://latex-community.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=21427
I have two questions:
(1) Is there an easier LyX-solution than recompiling or using a py
