On 28-Feb-2002 John Levon wrote:
> are you lot plotting aganist me or what ? :)
We? NEVER!
> anyway, if you look closer, you'll see all I did was move the waitpid(0,...)
> in cursorToggle to waitpid(spellchecker_pid, in sp_spell.C
>
> Not what I would call wizardry exactly :)
Hmmm you never
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 12:39:53PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> He seems pretty confident about such wizardry doesn't he? Tomorrow is Friday,
> after all, so the timing is perfect if things do go wrong ;-)
are you lot plotting aganist me or what ? :)
anyway, if you look closer, you'll see all
> "Garst" == Garst R Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Garst> :) Can someone please commit John's patch so it can get some
Garst> testing before the weekend?
Done.
JMarc
> "Garst" == Garst R Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Garst> Are they publicly available? url? Garst
They are not. But nobody can refuse anything to ANgus.
JMarc
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> On Thursday 28 February 2002 1:05 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Angus> wrote:
>> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Angus> I'll let you do it. I'm compiling the xforms source at the
Angus> moment.
>> Great!
On Thursday 28 February 2002 1:05 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> I'll let you do it. I'm compiling the xforms source at the
> Angus> moment.
>
> Great! Are there interesting changes since 0.89.6?
I don't know. I didn't hav
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> I'll let you do it. I'm compiling the xforms source at the
Angus> moment.
Great! Are there interesting changes since 0.89.6?
JMarc
On Thursday 28 February 2002 12:34 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> On Thursday 28 February 2002 11:16 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Angus> wrote:
> >> > "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> Angus, do y
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> On Thursday 28 February 2002 11:16 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Angus> wrote:
>> > "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> Angus, do you plan to apply John's patch?
>>
>> JMarc
Angus> Whilst almost all the patch i
On Thursday 28 February 2002 11:16 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus, do you plan to apply John's patch?
>
> JMarc
Whilst almost all the patch is code removal, there's a bit of X-magic in
reapSpellchecker which I do not feel conf
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus, do you plan to apply John's patch?
JMarc
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 09:28:59PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | It's 115k of ^-.*$
>
> You can at least do the FIXME part a bit nicer...
>
> We really do not want the extern there, even in some fixme clause.
the uglier the code, the more chance it'll get fixed properly. OK, maybe not.
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 6:33 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 07:12:05PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >
> >> He is probably too busy.
> >
> | Then can someone commit it ?
> >
> | Lars, it really is almost entirely c
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 07:33:08PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Can you post it here first?
again !
ok
> Unless it is really large just post it as text/plain.
It's 115k of ^-.*$
regards
john
--
"This is just the kind of crackpot scheme I've been looking to champion!!!"
- P.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 07:12:05PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> He is probably too busy.
Then can someone commit it ?
Lars, it really is almost entirely code removal, apart from a small change
to code that is not worse than what was there before.
regards
john
--
"This is just the kind
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 5:05 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 03:53:19PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Not fixed. Fudged. Could you see if this fixes it properly.
>
> yes. valgrind is happy.
>
> john
Hoorah, hoorah, hoorah.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 03:53:19PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Not fixed. Fudged. Could you see if this fixes it properly.
yes. valgrind is happy.
john
--
"This is just the kind of crackpot scheme I've been looking to champion!!!"
- P.M. Hartke on 6U campaign
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 3:49 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 12:36:07PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > > - Under some circumstances (after the graphics have rendered, and very
regularly)
> > > I do not manage to exit. LyX goes dead on me, nothing works, not even
t
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 12:36:07PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > - Under some circumstances (after the graphics have rendered, and very regularly)
> > I do not manage to exit. LyX goes dead on me, nothing works, not even the 'x'
> > in the top right window corner. Pressing ^C prints 'Bye' an
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 2:55 pm, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 27-Feb-2002 Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > void InsetGraphics::updateInset() const
> > {
> > grfx::GCache & gc = grfx::GCache::get();
> > gc.update(*this);
> > + setCache();
> > + if (cached_status_ == grfx::WaitingT
On 27-Feb-2002 Angus Leeming wrote:
> void InsetGraphics::updateInset() const
> {
> grfx::GCache & gc = grfx::GCache::get();
> gc.update(*this);
> + setCache();
> + if (cached_status_ == grfx::WaitingToLoad) {
> + gc.startLoading(*this);
> + }
> }
As much as
On 27-Feb-2002 Angus Leeming wrote:
> Why will it stop you now? You'll get a box saying "Loading..." or something
> and, because you're loading asynchronously, you can still work.
Because I want to see the image so I have to stop there till the image is
converted loaded and the screen redrawn.
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 1:11 pm, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 27-Feb-2002 Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > That is correct. We have lazy loading of the image.
> > Why work when you don't need to?
>
> Do I have to like that? Well anyway I liked more the figinset way of doing
> things. Load the image
On 27-Feb-2002 Angus Leeming wrote:
> That is correct. We have lazy loading of the image.
> Why work when you don't need to?
Do I have to like that? Well anyway I liked more the figinset way of doing
things. Load the image in the background, but load it! This won't stop me later
if I have to ch
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 12:23 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> I don't know if this is related -- but there are still clear problems with the
> new graphics.
>
> - I don't ever manage to get a child processes dialog that is *not* greyed out,
> or has any entries in it.
Well, the browsers are on
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:38:36AM +, Jules Bean wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 01:38:20PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:26:57AM +, Jules Bean wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:18:10AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > > string id;
> >
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 11:48 am, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Did someone of you try to load the UserGuide? I failed on 3 of the 4 images!
> the first time and now I fail only on the platypus image. It seems to me that
> transforming only starts the first time the image should be visualized and n
Did someone of you try to load the UserGuide? I failed on 3 of the 4 images!
the first time and now I fail only on the platypus image. It seems to me that
transforming only starts the first time the image should be visualized and not
as expected as soon as the document is loaded. For images not c
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 01:38:20PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:26:57AM +, Jules Bean wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:18:10AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > string id;
> > > for (int i = 0; i < image.cpp; ++i) {
> > > id.push_back('A');
>
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:26:57AM +, Jules Bean wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:18:10AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > string id;
> > for (int i = 0; i < image.cpp; ++i) {
> > id.push_back('A');
> > }
> >
> > It's a bit clunky. Is there a better way of initiali
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> It's a bit clunky. Is there a better way of initialising a
Angus> string, with length image.cpp?
I think one of the string constructors do what you want...
JMarc
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:18:10AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> string id;
> for (int i = 0; i < image.cpp; ++i) {
> id.push_back('A');
> }
>
> It's a bit clunky. Is there a better way of initialising a string, with length
>image.cpp?
According to my copy of Str
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 11:06 am, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 06:23:21PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Thanks to all testers...
> >
> > I have just uploaded that ol' graphics patch to
> > http://www.devel.lyx.org/~leeming/graphics.diff.bz2
> > again. It contain
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 06:23:21PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Thanks to all testers...
>
> I have just uploaded that ol' graphics patch to
> http://www.devel.lyx.org/~leeming/graphics.diff.bz2
> again. It contains fixes to the bugs you've reported, and beautification of
> GConverter a
Thanks to all testers...
I have just uploaded that ol' graphics patch to
http://www.devel.lyx.org/~leeming/graphics.diff.bz2
again. It contains fixes to the bugs you've reported, and beautification of
GConverter and of GImageXPM but is mainly there for Lars to cast his beady
eye over.
35 matches
Mail list logo
