Re: update links on wiki

2007-11-17 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Or, as Joost prefers it, place the links on the main web site. I prefer this as well. > But I guess > that's a little bit more complicated compared to editing a wiki page. It > also requires commit privileges, but I think most people updating these > pages have that a

Re: update links on wiki

2007-11-13 Thread christian . ridderstrom
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Was anyone actually able to find the password for Windows.Windows etc online? Sure. Just go here http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-docs%40lists.lyx.org/ and enter "windows wiki password". It's the 3rd hit. Thanks. I see

Re: update links on wiki

2007-11-11 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Was anyone actually able to find the password for Windows.Windows etc > online? Sure. Just go here http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-docs%40lists.lyx.org/ and enter "windows wiki password". It's the 3rd hit. Jürgen

Re: update links on wiki

2007-11-11 Thread Joost Verburg
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: I think in the case were someone could link to an evil binary as "LyX 1.5.2 installer", we should be much more restrictive. In my opinion the links to binaries should be on the main LyX site, not on the wiki. Joost

Re: update links on wiki

2007-11-11 Thread christian . ridderstrom
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Andre Poenitz wrote: Which means the design is lame. Wasn't the intention to have a weak 'protection' only to save us from spam bots? I think in the case were someone could link to an evil binary as "LyX 1.5.2 installer", we should be much mo

Re: update links on wiki

2007-11-11 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Which means the design is lame. > > Wasn't the intention to have a weak 'protection' only to save us from > spam bots? I think in the case were someone could link to an evil binary as "LyX 1.5.2 installer", we should be much more restrictive. Jürgen

Re: update links on wiki

2007-11-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 04:51:14PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > At least it is lame by design :-) > > Which means the design is lame. Wasn't the intention to have a weak 'protection' only to save us from spam bots? Andre'

Re: update links on wiki

2007-11-10 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > At least it is lame by design :-) Which means the design is lame. Jürgen

Re: update links on wiki

2007-11-10 Thread christian . ridderstrom
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Edwin Leuven wrote: Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Edwin Leuven wrote: > i had the impression a password was needed It is. But it's not really secret (I found it within 5 minutes on the Internet). how lame... At least it is lame by design :-) /C -- Christian Ridders

Re: update links on wiki

2007-11-08 Thread Edwin Leuven
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Edwin Leuven wrote: i had the impression a password was needed It is. But it's not really secret (I found it within 5 minutes on the Internet). how lame...

Re: update links on wiki

2007-11-08 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Edwin Leuven wrote: > i had the impression a password was needed It is. But it's not really secret (I found it within 5 minutes on the Internet). Jürgen

Re: update links on wiki

2007-11-08 Thread Edwin Leuven
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Edwin Leuven wrote: perhaps someone can update the links to 1.5.2 here: http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/Windows Why not you? i had the impression a password was needed

Re: update links on wiki

2007-11-07 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Edwin Leuven wrote: > perhaps someone can update the links to 1.5.2 here: > > http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/Windows Why not you? Jürgen

update links on wiki

2007-11-07 Thread Edwin Leuven
perhaps someone can update the links to 1.5.2 here: http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/Windows