Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> what i checked was that rtf->LaTeX->LyX was worse than rtf->html->LaTeX->LyX.
> but it was not deep testing and i think it will be difficult to obtain
> some precise measure of this.
Good.
> anyway this patch didnt harm anything because currently i haven
> >> When is it supposed to be useful?
> >
> > when i have rtf file which i want to be imported in lyx.
>
> I see. I thought we had some rtf2latex converter already, but I read
> now that these things are a bit outdated. Is unrtf the only decent
> solution? Did yo
had some rtf2latex converter already, but I read
now that these things are a bit outdated. Is unrtf the only decent
solution? Did you check that the rtf->html->LaTeX->LyX route is indeed
the most precise one?
JMarc
> > if there are no objections i would like to add this convertor to configure
> > script.
>
> When is it supposed to be useful?
when i have rtf file which i want to be imported in lyx.
pavel
Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi,
>
> if there are no objections i would like to add this convertor to configure
> script.
When is it supposed to be useful?
JMarc
LaTeX -> RTF converter', ['latex2rtf -p -S -o $$o $$i',
'latex2rt -p -S -o $$o $$i'],
rc_entry = [ r'\converter latex rtf"%%" "needaux"' ])
#
+checkProg('a RTF -> HTML converter', [
