Re: [LyX/master] Remove unneeded files from extract.sh

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Sure, but we have 4.3M in typeof/, which is only required because the > bcopy decided that we needed the whole directory bbecause we use the > whole function directory. I removed it. If we know that it is not needed it is one line in extract.sh:-) > Actually, it s

Re: [LyX/master] Remove unneeded files from extract.sh

Le 07/06/16 à 21:16, Georg Baum a écrit : commit bdbe81be15b78d3edd658f9ce94fdf34ff825aea Author: Georg Baum Date: Tue Jun 7 21:10:19 2016 +0200 Remove unneeded files from extract.sh We do require less files from boost now. Sure, but we have 4.3M in typeof/, which is only required

unneeded files

Does anybody know why there is dist_noinst_DATA = \ ... images/font-smallcaps.png \ images/math/ams_arrows.png \ images/math/ams_misc.png \ images/math/ams_nrel.png \ images/math/ams_ops.png \ images/math/ams_rel.png \ images/math/ar

Re: [patch] unneeded files

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | -dir destdir is not really needed, what is needed is the argument to | -convert to be any file with path. And fdesign to output to current working dir. -- Lgb

Re: [patch] unneeded files

Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> The distcheck target in newer automake is a bit stricter than in >> previous versions. Among others it requires that when doing a VPATH >> build, _nothing_ should change outside the build dir. >> >> The scripts in xforms/fo

Re: [patch] unneeded files

Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > The distcheck target in newer automake is a bit stricter than in > previous versions. Among others it requires that when doing a VPATH > build, _nothing_ should change outside the build dir. > > The scripts in xforms/forms does not ahere to this rule. Hmmm. I guess th

Re: [patch] unneeded files

Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> It would be nice if people could try this patch (the mkinstalldirs >> part really) and see if they have any problems. > | Lars, > | I've had no problems at all installing in /home/angus/testing | following 'make maintainer-c

Re: [patch] unneeded files

Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > It would be nice if people could try this patch (the mkinstalldirs > part really) and see if they have any problems. Lars, I've had no problems at all installing in /home/angus/testing following 'make maintainer-clean'. This with a stock FC 1. Angus -- Angus

[patch] unneeded files

It would be nice if people could try this patch (the mkinstalldirs part really) and see if they have any problems. My testing so far shows no problems. (OTOH I know of a problem in POTFILES.in generation... src/support/path_defines.C is not always there... and should thus be excluded from POTFIL

[patch] unneeded files BootFormat etc

We don't need this. It just makes the maintaince more cumbersome. Index: Chktex.C === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/Chktex.C,v retrieving revision 1.32 diff -u -p -r1.32 Chktex.C --- Chktex.C 6 Oct 2003 15:42:01 -000