Re: trunk and autoconf 2.64

Pavel Sanda wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Could someone knowledgeable please update the autotools to support autoconf 2.64? can you report back it works? Why do we put a higher limit by the way? to avoid clashes with untested autotools versions? IMHO, a

Re: trunk and autoconf 2.64

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: >>> Could someone knowledgeable please update the autotools to support >>> autoconf 2.64? >>> >> >> can you report back it works? >> > > Why do we put a higher limit by the way? to avoid clashes with untested autotools versions? pavel

Re: trunk and autoconf 2.64

Pavel Sanda wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Hello, Could someone knowledgeable please update the autotools to support autoconf 2.64? can you report back it works? Why do we put a higher limit by the way? Abdel.

Re: trunk and autoconf 2.64

Pavel Sanda wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Hello, Could someone knowledgeable please update the autotools to support autoconf 2.64? can you report back it works? It does, thanks. Abdel.

Re: trunk and autoconf 2.64

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Hello, > > Could someone knowledgeable please update the autotools to support autoconf > 2.64? can you report back it works? pavel

trunk and autoconf 2.64

Hello, Could someone knowledgeable please update the autotools to support autoconf 2.64? Thanks in advance, Abdel.